A recent open letter signed by tech giants, including Elon Musk, has called for a halt in AI development, citing "profound risks to society and humanity." But could this pause lead to a more dangerous outcome? The AI landscape resembles the classic Prisoner's Dilemma, where cooperation yields the best results, but betrayal tempts players to seek personal gain.
If OpenAI pauses work on ChatGPT, will others follow, or will they capitalize on the opportunity to surpass OpenAI? This is particularly worrisome given the strategic importance of AI in global affairs and the potential for less transparent actors to monopolize AI advancements.
Instead of halting development, OpenAI should continue its work while advocating for responsible and ethical AI practices. By acting as a role model, implementing safety measures, and collaborating with the global AI community to establish ethical guidelines, OpenAI can help ensure that AI technology benefits humanity rather than becoming a tool for exploitation and harm.
The solution to AI's challenges is not a simple halt in research efforts. A nuanced approach involving continued progress, collaboration, and the establishment of ethical and safety protocols is essential to making AI work for everyone.
That would be the ideal solution. Why am I reminded of Alfred Nobel? Does anyone really think terrorist, criminal, and state sponsored intelligence organizations will abide with such an accord, even if anything else will hasten Armageddon?
The AI answer is the real world one. How ironic.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/elon-musk-open-letter-ai/
"The proposed pause should be looked on as a way to make AI development "more accurate, safe, interpretable, transparent, robust, aligned, trustworthy, and loyal," while working alongside lawmakers to create AI governance systems."
Good luck successfully implementing even a six month pause.
Isn't Elons whole gig going to Mars and self driving cars?
Maybe his priority is now stopping Twitter bots.
The man is a moron.
Given what he's accomplished, that seems a tad harsh. Doesn't make him right on this or any other specific thing, but moron he isn't.
This thread makes me annoyed when you have (finally) the perfect opportunity to make AI bots playing GalCiv against the player and provide a great solo experience. So... without involving Elon Musk and twitter problems, how soon can we expect this to be in GalCiv i wonder.
How about...in less than 30 days?
someone make all this user interface stuff scriptable and editable through talking so we can pick and choose through everyones styles what to use and see real time samples before we hit change... .DakaPhoenix pulls hair out
You're right I should have called him a Twit.
BTW.He has'nt accomplished anything w/o government handouts and foreign money.
I couldn't have accomplished what he has with any amount of OPM.
Agreed. He's a genius in his field, AND that doesn't automatically make his opinions right in other areas.
GalCivIV Supernova will utilize AI!!!
!*@#-ing Awesome
You're right I should have called him a Twit.BTW.He has'nt accomplished anything w/o government handouts and foreign money.
Don't back off it.
He really is a moron.
Could we agree that he's a Meshugana
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account
