The ape in me loves NOVA 

I find it rather ironic that the people that have no problem admitting they are evolved from apes, or some version thereof, are the ones that use reason, math, and science, where the ones that were poofed into existence from some magical, all knowing, all seeing being refuse to use their brain at all and just take the word of a few wackos as truth. You would think that this being would grant these delusional people a little insight.

Are these the the same over-medicated cookoos that tell the atheist that they're religious?
I would rather converse with a snail then continue to debate with talking snakes and burning bushes. 

ROFL GFT 

No never thought of that. I am a human, the first thing that came to my mind was...

Why are so few things considered designed by a designer when it is quite obvious that most things are not???

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=NZR_jo_tCy0&NR=1

Biblical creationists (religions in general) have an unlimited number of excuses to explain away the real world we have come to understand today. As an atheist, I have been called astonishing things by religious folk who believe only their specific bible is the true word of their specific god (just making a point) and the only accurate historical document we have today???  And because I don’t, I am considered closed minded, insensitive, hateful, a truth denier, hypocritical, oblivious, blasphemy (of course) and just plain wrong about everything. Oh yea, evolution doesn’t work because the bible told me so. Well life just keeps on trucking semi forward and the databank is cumulative, and I think that this problem is mostly going to go away all just from their own specific dogmas. And the only thing they can say, every single time, no matter the topic or the discussion … what it all boils down to is “God did it”.

Richard Dawkins One Fact to Refute Creationism.   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4Q2tkfMU_g&feature=related

I'm gonna be that guy and point out some serious flaws with the OP (other than the fact that it is obviously a marketing video intended to promote a certain ideology, and not just educate):

@0:45~0:59 - What if a "future" discovery does in fact cause the earth to be viewed as a different "shape"?  This is one of the most serious disservices that modern "scientists" are inflicting on not only those that blindly believe their assertions, but also themselves; and it goes against the very nature of "science".  As humanity has grown back into a more clear understanding of reality, we have slowly but surely come to discover that our dimension contains much more depth than once believed.  In a three dimensional perspective, the planet earth is indeed "a spherical object frozen in space".  However, even this perspective is merely a stepping stone in the evolution of understanding.  A fourth dimensional perspective is one in which the individual entity classified as "earth" is thought of as merely a system, or relationship between opposing forces (energies), that takes on many "shapes and sizes", and which is actually just a smaller part of a much more wholistic machine.  Einstein's theory of relativity represents a turning point in this development of consciousness, however the majority of humanity (including the producer of the video in the OP) are still stuck in a Newtonian way of viewing their reality.  Slowly, but surely, the sphere rolls.  "Science" can help expedite this process by not insisting that the current level of generally accepted knowledge is de facto.

The other issue with this assertion is that it actually isn't scientifically sound.  Many ancient cultures around the globe knew that the larger being of which they were a part is (in a three dimensional sense) spherical.  Really only about half of us believed it to be flat, and only for a moment in history.  In fact, most of the truly modern and fringe concepts being propounded by the scientific community directly reflect the ancient philosophies from which the core of almost all religions is formed.

I also wouldn't call modern medicine much more than a cure for modern afflictions, for rich people.  60% of the planet doesn't even have clean drinking water.  Anesthesia and the mapping of the human circulatory system are not new by any stretch of the imagination either.

Scientists and historians both need to be much more critical in their deductions, too much is taken on the word of others that aren't actually deserving of such credence.  This video is a great example: just because it's title contains the word "science" the majority of it's viewers will most likely not bother to validate the assertions made within.  No word, not even that of a "scientist", should ever over-power an individual's internal evaluation of truth. 

@2:39 - Memory foam?  The running shoe?  The electric razor?  Breast implants?  Really?  Just because Sid Meier says a civilization is advanced does not make it so.  The bible actually does contain many more beneficial contributions towards the development of human consciousness than most of the inventions mentioned, and it's just a rewrite.  If the vision of a modern Christian is considered simplistic, it does not reflect the heart of their religion, the same heart found in the monasteries of religions all over the world.

Science and religion are not opposites.  Religion is the science of developing human consciousness, and science should be the art of nurturing the human environment.

Honestly, that this video symbolizes education in any way is scary.  Science and trust have nothing to do with one another.  I depart this thread most likely never to return.

Oh and +1 for white buses.

I don't think you fully appreciate how awesome electric razors are. I recently switched after using everything from straight razors to disposables, and they're fantastic.

Actually, I haven't used a straight blade in years either.  Then again, I only shave when I have to.

The ability to copy paste from a dictionary does not demonstrate understanding.  There are many search engines available to assist in further grasping anything I may have written that you are finding complex.  I am also willing to entertain an intelligent conversation, but you must excuse me if the very nature of this thread did not accurately represent the probability of actually finding one within.  My sources will not be coming from Youtube, or even all the very large books on my shelves (like the dictionary), but the accumulated understanding of those books - me.  You may argue with those books on your own time.

The point of the above line is escaping me, please clarify.

Christianity is just one of the many view points that my unique perspective is derived from; neurochemical psychology, physics, Vedanta, Taoism, and a lifetime's devotion to the evolution of religious thought are a few others.  I also wouldn't classify this thread as much of a conversation, and I apologize if I've wasted your time, but you alone choose how it is spent.

Who said anything about copy and paste? And what could that have to do with anything? I use search engines all the time but you error if you feel that I care enough about what you are want to say if you are incapable of using plain English. What is intelligent about making things as up with your start here?

GirlFriendTess......

There are only two types of people who would argue a Religious-based topic on the net.... fanatics and trolls.

The former won't be swayed and the latter won't care.

You're on a hiding to nothing.....

Glad we're on the same page.  Keep this in mind next time somebody attempts to hint at the notion that viewing the planet as simply a three dimensional sphere in space is not only a dated perspective, but also an extremely limiting one.

"We" don't know anything, as you and I obviously have quite different backgrounds.  However both of us

Mankind itself is behind most of the plagues that it suffers from.  Is politics a religion or a science?

A book, and what people do with it, are two entirely different matters.  Personally I was able to derive quite a bit of historical and psychological insight from the text.

Healers have been practicing anesthesiology for thousands of years.

Most religious folk I know consider themselves quite erred, including myself.  Every day brings new struggles, and growth.

Where am I "popping in from", and how exactly am I redirecting the OP?

Why are you so quick to dismiss a discovery that you haven't even attempted to make yet?

"We" (people performing experiments), are doing this every day.  Einstein disproved Newton's theory of gravity.  I thought we agreed that "science isn't defacto"?

What?

I might ask you to be so considerate in your denigrating of the intelligent design theory, but I really don't care what you do.  The fact that you feel my contributions to the thread diminish the value of it's content in any way tells me nothing more than how little you care for this "conversation".  Honestly, the thread feels more like a support group for insecurity.  Please clarify your goals, but only if you are actually interested in discussing the theory of intelligent design, or relativity, or anything other than the unsupported assertion that Christianity at it's core is ignorant.  Ignorance comes in all shapes and sizes, and from all walks of life.  I really don't care to discuss the matter.

I might actually buy this shirt if I saw it hanging in a store.

If you are truly interesting in these lines of thought, I recommend the authors Amit Goswami, and P.D. Ouspensky's "Tertium Organum", just to name a couple.

WOW, that is one, weak ass argument.