This Fall I’m starting to get back into skinning. For the past 8 months or so, I’ve been the interim Project Manager on Elemental: War of Magic to get that game ready for release – which I failed spectacularly at. Sometimes, the answer is not to “work harder”. But I digress.
The problem I’m seeing with skinning is business vs. passion. That is, Windows XP users still represent a near majority of the people using our skinning programs. The problem is, Windows XP is dead as a technology base. I don’t want to even support it any longer. I want us to make cutting edge technology using WPF and Silverlight and other things that can show what is possible.
A lot of the new Windows technologies have been under used which is a real shame because there’s some great stuff there.
My main worry right now is that WPF is not being well supported by Microsoft and I don’t want us to get into a tech that Microsoft is going to abandon (GDI+, cough cough).
See http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/13/microsoft_defends_silverlight/ for my concerns.
Now that's some GREAT news! I hope we can see some good (new) stuff from now on
XP as a dead technology has some advantages. For one thing hacking into the OS to create effects wont upset any service packs or upgrades into the future. I would not be surprised if some bright spark comes up with something like Compiz. XP might become the hobbyist OS.
Its important you make cutting edge technology, keeps the punters happy and brings new blood into skinning.
Two separate packages for two OS could be a good way to go.
I wonder if they will really abandon WPF. I worked for a company that used WPF for a client front-end and it was pretty solid. Some people within the company wanted to use AIR instead, but AIR seems like such a resource hog.
Look at it this way Brad: Yes, your user base is heavily invested in XP. Because your skinning products are held back by your commitment to XP support, these products fail to wow Aero/whatever users. If you want non-XP users, you'll have to take the leap and produce a cutting-edge product. So, in other words, XP support leads to skinning products that are hard to market to non-XP users, and leaves you with lots of XP users. By moving on, you will lose those XP users but you will gain new customers and hopefully a lot of good press for doing something new and exciting.
Takes a big man to admit something like that...
and an even bigger man to eat that man
Glad to hear it Brad, I will be keeping up with what your doing as u move on this.
Cheers.
Glad to have you on this side of the fence for a while!!
Coool.. cant wait to see whats in store..
XP still represents a huge portion of the market share, so I would continue supporting it. It's never going to generate long term growth, but can be a nice cash cow in the interim.
There's probably a whole bunch of regular skinners out there who didn't even know Frogboy didn't 'just' run Stardock and provide the 'skinnables', but also skinned [skun] like the rest of us.
Back when it ALL was a hobby [other than the CEO-ing, of course]....when skinning was everyone's "diversion".
Lately I've been getting 'back' to it....though this time delving into the GUI 'interface' of an aeroplane in a Flight Sim..... loads of coding and trial-and-error.... and getting all anal over every last pixel....
Good to see the skinning end of the world coming to the fore again....
And this means ? Anything getting better regarding the desastrous state of Object Desktop ? Or is this just another of Your countless 'Oh, I will do something.' threads again ? Sorry Brad, but You have lost my personal trust over the last 1-2 years completely...
Stalking Piper Cubs and Airliners. Shame on you.
Glad you're getting back to skinning, Brad. I hope that'll bode well for the software.
I like c242 and understand where he's coming from, but you return here and despite unhappiness from the past, don't lose hope for the future, mate.
I had a longer post but it kicked me out and I had to log back in, wtf.
is this just another silverlight push?
right or wrong, I equate silverlight with flash. Idisable flash so why would I think silverlight is a good thing?
Good to hear Brad!
DrJBHL : Believe me, I would be so glad if at least this one happened.
i for one am looking forward to you creating new skins. welcome back, brad.
*treetog smiles*
Shapeshifter
Brad, awesome news! Let us have all you've got!
DesktopX needs your love, by the way....
Then go away, c242. I really could care less what you think. In fact, let me show you the door.
I know a lot of people are still running Windows XP but one of the things that made skinning for me less fun was having to make stuff that would work on many different versions of Windows. At some point, it stops being a hobby/fun and turns into "real work".
I'm liking Windows 7 but I don't think Microsoft is really thinking about the user experience much anymore (look at the state of IE9. Yikes).
WPF is interesting but it's not easy to customize it, you'd be back making apps that themselves can be skinned.
On the other hand, a WPF based shell might be interesting.
I've only been here at WC for a short while but I have dug deep into the galleries and have seen much of your earlier work. Seeing what you can come up with now should be very interesting. Make as much stuff as you want, I'll be reserving space on my HDD for my "Frogboy Collection"
I haven't dished out for Windows 7 yet...why? Because it costs 80% more (based on a direct exchange rate) than in the US. If someone wants to help me in some way...well I'd switch and then...and THEN I'd be uber pleased to switch to DesktopX based on whatever beautiful engine Windows 7 might provide. The object model as it was is pretty darn good, and the scripting options are still actually very open and flexible. If you could leverage some of the WPF image presentation and manipulation features that'd be cool! Take us out into new waters! New horizons! Endless possibilities! More Calenda...more something!
Vista entrenched me further into XP for gadget development. I preferred to find ways around XPs limitations than drown in an unknown, very restrictive territory. XP just let me plug away at my own 'stuff' knowing where I stood.
DesktopX gave me a way to interface more directly with my computer experience and gave me power to 'make it and do it the way I wanted' without having to learn a fully fledged programming language. Find more ways to break the 'presentation' barrier and get us access to *all* the bits we want to see and touch and play with. Windowblinds, Deskscapes, etc gives us a lot of see and feel, DesktopX I think is still a key to the touch and play.
Glad to hear it Brad
Happy to see you return to skinnin'.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account
