Whew .. to be honest, i don't remember if i've ever registered my self here. Well, forget it .. If this is my blog .. then this is my blog ..
But I'm sorry, thought that i don't know what to post here .. if you want to know more about me .. Please visit my main blog at i.do.blog ..
Cheers ..
Let's end the fight. We are not WinCustomizers. We are not hardcore GalCiv2 gamers. We are all Stardockians.
And what's the point in arguing; none of us will get out alive from this madhouse anyway
My point exactly. We were not arguing, at least i didnt think so. Thats why i found jafo's defensive comments so absurd.
I don't think Jafo was calling PC games or anyone who plays them childish - given his 90+ personal collection - but rather to point out that Stardockians on the customization side of things could viwe gaming as pointless exercise, as Mumblefratz did when he personally said that saw no real value in skinning. Again, it comes back to 'each to his/her own'... however, it is respecting one another's chosen hobbies/pastimes and not denigrating their choice[s].
I do enjoy playing the few games I do possess, but while I'm not an avid gamer and have no need to get the latest and greatest, I can understand/relate to those who do because I'm into customising my desktop and like to keep abreast of the latest and greatest apps to achieve what I like to do with it.
[quote}I don't think Jafo was calling PC games or anyone who plays them childish[/quote]
Errrm, i don't believe there is any room for misinterpretation in this comment,
I do see though a big difference between Mumblefratz expressing a view that he finds no real value in skinning and Jafo saying games are childish. Mumbles comments are opinion that disrespects no-one nor anyone's choosen hobby. Much like if i was to say i don't really see the point of Myspace. I'm not calling it childish or making any remarks about it, just stating it's not for me.
Jafo did not. And the fact that he is an employee of the company that is pioneering a new era in PC gaming (see the many steps SD have taken to assure gamers rights) i find very strange for him to label games, and therefore gamers in that manner.
This is not, and wasnt a Gamer VS Skinner debate, but there is a stigmatism coming from the skinning devs that the gaming side of SD is irrelevant. These comments and others recently point that way for my mind anyway.
The first case implies that I believe skinning to be of no value, what I actually said was skinning has no real value *to me*. The first case is denigrating the artform the second case is merely stating a personal opinion.
Nor did I take Jafo's comments to be denigrating to "gamers". In the same light if someone does hold the view that games are senseless or childish I can't really argue against their opinion. Neither would it anger or bother me in any way.
As I've said a number of times I was merely honestly wondering what all the interest is about because in "real life" I've never met anyone that has ever even used the word "skinning".
If you go roller skating at the roller rink you probably think most everyone roller skates but in reality very few people do.
I repeat that I'm nor denigrating your artform but I am suggesting that if I say what's all this about skinning and someone replies "you can't be serious" my response is I most certainly am. The vanity comes into play in your assumptions that everyone both knows what this is and appreciates it. I suggest that 99% of all people don't even know about it so how can this be so universal an appeal.
By the way, other than Solitare, Minesweeper and whatever else comes with the OS these days, I own precisely 2 games and yes I agree they have no functional use.
Neilo ....time to sharpen your English Comprehension skills....
The description of PC games as 'childish' was/is a direct counter to the assertion that skinning/GUI modding must be for the vain.
Note the subsequent para where I add I have 90+ games installed myself and obviously a skinner too....so either I am BOTH vain AND childish.... or I am neither.
Simple, really....
It would pay to not use a Wiki or any informal information source as definitive...
....and 'vanity' even in THAT definition is about one's own perception of one's ability/appearance aka 'ego' which has exactly nothing to do with the creation of graphic art.
It could be argued equally poorly that it was 'vanity' th made people play games....confident their personal superiority, self-importance and ego would win out...instead of the simple thrill of competitive spirit...
Whatever.
@Mumble/Neilo: really guys? Mumble, we all know, all too well, your views on the superflous. Do we really need a running commentary every single time in multiple threads and forums every time you have a thought disagreeing? I mean, don't get me wrong here, I think you're a good guy from all the time I worked with you in the MVL, and definitely a knowledgeable player; but yeah, its not that I disagree with you, its just that I'm getting kind of tired of hearing it over and over again- its like Walter Mathau's character from Grumpy Old Men- just not as funny. And Neilo, I've told you before that you need to just step back before you write out responses, again its not that I disagree always, but dang kid, you sure aren't winning any points.
@Jafo: You are right in that if anyone had actually read the entire response, they should have seen/surmised that you were being tongue-in-cheek, esp. since you mentioned your ownership of 90+ games. However, I will at least defend M/N in that there has seemed to be a runup in strange moderator behavior since the forums got linked together; and its caused some issues now and then. For example, I am at a loss to figure out why a particular forum moderator locks threads that have reasonable questions that he answers and that have no bad or offensive content whatsoever; instead of just moving it to the proper forum. But its his call, just very very weird (esp since it brings undue attention to those threads). My point is that the winks, nudge, nudge, and then random locks, is just causing a divide between the mods/devs and the Users- i miss the good ole straightforward, right to point SD that i continue to use and love.
-Silver-
Look you've grabbed onto a comment that I made almost in passing that has little real importance to me. If you wish and it makes you feel better then I'll concede that skinning is the greatest thing since sliced bread.
What I brought up that was of considerable more importance to me and something to which you at least acknowledged partial agreement, is the problem of the mixing of all of SD's sites and the implications that has on each individual site.
It's clear that the mixing is supported by the highest levels at Stardock and is that is not about to change. Fine.
But the two points I brought up about it seem reasonable to more than just myself. First and assumedly less controversial is just knowing the context of someone's interest by knowing where each reply in a shared forum comes from.
Secondly if were going to share forums then let's really share forums. Could someone possibly publish a site map indicating the different forums and on which sites they're accessible from?
Basically it should be clear to someone who their audience is. For example I had no clue the Impulse forum was a subforum of Stardock Support. To me it was just the forum that seemed to have so many threads that it blotted out the sun. But the Off Topic forum and it's Personal Computing forum isn't as widely accessible.
If I go into a McDonald's in Paris, I have a good idea what's on the menu even if they call French Fries, frites. The same with Stardock's sites. The menu should at least be consistent. If people are posting things that conceivably gets spread across all 19 of SD's site they should at least be aware of that fact and it shouldn't matter whether you're at galciv2, sins, Impulse, etc.
My humble opinion:
Is it vanity to use skins and windowsblinds? Not more then to buy a nice kitchen table with a glass surface instead of a cheep table at a secont-hand store. Some people are content with a table with 4 legs and a surface you can put your plate on, other people want/need more to enjoy their enviroment. Some people wants no distractions when they are working. Other need their music/coffe/TV in the background to work more effectively.
I´ve been both a "bare-bone" user and a "skin junkie", so i should know Right now, i´m an undecided voter. But i do prefer a nice looking user enviroment to a DOS shell right now
Just stick with whatever you like best.
And hey, remember:
http://xkcd.com/438/
Peace and out
Still at it, I see.
The site issues forums are a special case. They exist solely to inform Andrew (and the other web devs, though mostly just Andrew right now) of issues and help him track things down (he's the forum dev), so if he feels something isn't helpful to that goal, he'll close it down; it's as simple as that. This policy is posted in a sticky in every site issues forum which it is particular to, and is particular to *only* those forums.
I understand that you never said Jafo's comments were anything mate, those are my opnions based on his comments here and in other posts, it was just time to say it out in the open.
I'm not out to win points at all. Simply stating my thoughts and feelings. I did wait till i made my 2nd response...many hours in fact. What is it in my 2nd response that was bad? That i criticized a stardockian. Was my point incorrect? Maybe so, but it is my opinion that Jafo's comments, when you take into context the other threads i have observed this behaviour in, were un called for and outright silly.
And Silver...Kid...really? Talk to Seth like that mate if ya want......I don't need to be told to back off or quiet down. I have done that too much, i expressed my opnion in a non abusive manner without being anything but civil. It's as good as it's gonna get. I'm not being an ass to you mate, i understand you are just watching my back here but i felt i needed to express my feelings here.
Jafo..I did note the said paragraph with the 90+ games comment. But you yourself seemed to disregarde them for your own argument.
You did though make my original point for me Jafo. That this conversation should never be taking place. If the SD sites were never connected as they are, you would not need to bother with my poor english comprehension skills nor i with what i perceive as your condescending attitude toward the GC2 side of the fence.
Your comments made my point exactly, thankyou. The difference between the gamers and skinners is a wide enough void that the two parties will never get along. This thread is an example of that. You took to the defensive very quickly Jafo over what was a personal opinion and, be it tounge in cheek or not, attacked the gamers straight off the bat. If your reactions are like these, what are we to expect the greater wincustomize communities reaction to be? Fair enough, the flip side is i was quick to defend the gaming side of the coin which only proves my point further.
As i have maintained, it would have been far better for each respective community to be it's own forum.
Yeah...very poorly.
Wouldn't be terribly difficult, but in simplest terms:
Impulse category is for support purposes; since all our products are available through Impulse, it's on pretty much all of the sites. In an ideal world, this would mean that people having similar problems with different products could share threads and get help all at once, but unfortunately that's not been the case so much of the time. This forum should slow down though as Impulse comes into its own over the next several months.
Off-Topic is, at last check, shared between the games sites and Impulse Community only.
Personal Computing is on most sites (Games, Impulse, WC, JU). PC Gaming is similar but is not on WC.
I hate that spellcheck, edit and the quote feature still don't seem to be working properly.
In skinning's defense, you've got to ask how many people out in the world will know about GalCiv, by comparison: not many. Granted, "gamers" are a more easily identifiable demographic, so it's easier to find people of like mind. But that in no way denigrates it, that's just how it is; we're all just insects in the big scheme of things.
As far as the lack of utility in skinning, mumble, look at it this way: we all agree that the default Luna skin in XP is total garbage--we only differ on why that is, and what to do about it. You don't like it because of the bloat factor, and disable it completely; skinners don't like it because it looks like crap, and opt instead to replace it with something more palatable. Both are completely valid choices, it just depends on what's more important to you personally.
Poor putradi. I guess he didn't realize what he was stepping into.
I'd imagine that's more just because the sharing of categories is not as obvious on their side of the fence, since this one (for example) has been there for a very long time. So they generally expect that people posting here will be doing it there or on JU, where they'll already be familiar with the subject.
It stands to reason that people will be defensive of their preferred hobbies over others, but I think in time everyone can get past it and get along with each other, once the category-sharing becomes more widely-known.
Granted some people may feel that one or the other is more important than the other--tastes and reasons vary widely, of course--but for the great majority of people, there's no reason they have to be mutually exclusive. For example, I'm not deep into the skinning stuff myself, but I do use Windowblinds, IconPackager, and ObjectDock. In the case of WB, it's just a matter of making windows more palatable aesthecally; I hate Luna, and would rather use the classic 9x appearance than it (given a machine where WB isn't an option, I do just that), but I find it a lot more pleasant to use a simple and clean WB theme. Likewise for the icons, and in that case it's a fire-and-forget customization, so it uses no more resources than the defaults. ObjectDock, on the other hand, I use solely for the usability improvement (just mouse over to monitor #2 and one click to open any of my most-used programs).
Not at all. I probably digressed more than necessary, but suffice to say, they're some of our customization software--but you probably gathered that much. I imagine the specifics of what they do are really moot here.
My point is simply that everyone's got a reason for what they choose to do, and none in any way invalidate any one else's reasons--it's all personal choice and taste. All that I ask here is that we acknoweldge that. Prefer a lean and clean system? Perfectly good choice. Prefer to exercise dominion over your machine through aesthetics? Also valid. Your "I personally don't understand why one would want to do that" is perfectly fine. Just try not to take it personally when people take that as a question, and try to explain why. Likewise, there's no reason that those who like skinning a lot should take that as a challenge or an insult.
This is just as true for both sides, so don't think I'm singling you or anyone out here. We can all get along if we want to.
*Pixeleo wishes he had the time to read all these novel-length replies*
Why can't they all talk in monosyllables?
Why gamer say skin is bad? Make skiinner feel sad.
OK, don't feel bad. Skin is good. Happy. Happy.
Oh boy! Me happy now!
Skinning? Why that's what you do to that twelve point buck you just dragged out of the woods.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account