How will we feed our billions?
In Galactic Civilizations III, we presume that by the time we are colonizing planets, our home world has reached an equilibrium between food production and population. But let's face it: when we colonize other planets, it'll take many years for those planets to build up sufficient farming infrastructure to produce for the kinds of populations you have on your home world.
Surplus Food
Galactic Civilizations III will be treating food a bit differently to reflect the awareness of just how important a large population is on your planets.
When Galactic Civilizations III first shipped, players built farms on planets and that would increase that planet's population. Because it was so easy to increase your population, our conversion between population to production was: production = the square root of population.
When Galactic Civilizations III v2.0 came out, we changed this so that food became a global resource that was then consumed by cities. You could build as many farms as you wanted elsewhere, and then build cities on another planet that used that food. Because this made increasing population more challenging (requiring two tiles -- a farming tile and a city tile), the formula was changed to production = population. This proved better on paper than in practice because on larger maps, players had no problem dedicating entire worlds just to farming, no matter how terrible the planet or how unrealistic that would be. This worked well for building other planets to huge populations, but it created production quantities that were balance breaking.
Throughout the v2.x series, we have tinkered with the formulas for what it takes to build a farm and what it takes to build a city, to the point where players were becoming frustrated when they discovered they didn't have the right resource to build something.
For v3.0, we have created a much simpler - and we think, more intuitive - system. Good planets have arable land tiles. The better the planet, the more of these tiles it will have. You can choose to build farms on them or you can bulldoze them and build whatever you want. This reflects the fact that Ceti Alpha V (a class 6 world) is never going to have farms while even a wonderful planet like Earth (class 10) can't have its entire surface farmed (and we do abstract farming to an extent in that your initial colony is self-sufficient in food).
Thus, population = production. Arable land produces food without you having to do anything at all, but you can also build them up with various levels of farms and use that surplus food elsewhere. Some worlds will have no arable land. Others will have several.
In this example, my home planet starts with 2 arable tiles, which produces 2 food right away.
Now, unlike other resources, unused food doesn't accumulate. As my wife regularly reminds me, food spoils and I should stop eating it when it does. But it does mean that with a few good early planets, you can start building cities on planets without having to have built a single farm. It's proving to be a really interesting mechanic.
There are two good planets here. One with 3 food tiles and one with 1 food tile and an elerium deposit. Which one should I colonize first?
In the above example, getting the Elerium deposit means I can instantly build enhanced lasers, which have military significance. But if I settle the other planet, I can build a city on my home planet immediately. This creates some interesting strategic choices that simply did not exist before.
Galactic Civilizations III v3.0 is due for release in April.
Yeeep!
I look forward to those massive Martian farms.
One other change:
You can upgrade your colony capital without food to support higher populations.
lol, You misunderstand and complicate my point, which is not about different types of food, but more than one way to generate food. Adding a fishery for food production from the planets oceans is not to give you a food resource called fish but to increase the food resource already used in game. Same that a hydroponic module for starbases isn't to give you a food vegetable icon but to increase your food output. Do you think the starbase manufacturing module complicates the game?
More types of food generation buildings or modules are needed to ease the dependency on tile farming and it would help the AI and not complicate a damn thing. If you find that complicating perhaps you should take up checkers.
Currently in game we can add modules to increase manufacturing, economy, and research. But not food.
They could still keep these for building farms anyway, and they should get creative with it as well. I want to see some that are alien creatures comparable with cows or what not. Should give you not just a food bonus but a +soldiering bonus for the protein.
I really like this change, a different mechanic was necessary for food because otherwise it is either a balancing calculation or redundant to the specialized money/research/production buildings.
What does Yeeep! mean? His post had two parts to it. So yeeep, non carbon civs can scorched Earth? Or... yeeep there will be a way to restore lost arable tiles?
I wonder why the spacefaring civilizations haven't developed methods of lenghty food preservation... perhaps because certain wife had won the influence victory? Stellaris for example haves food stockpiles...
Thank God - more opportunity for more food, since it didn't seem possible to generate enough of it at a reasonable rate.
I'm hoping that eventually I can reach a stage where I can colonise a planet and it not take an eternity (since apparently I can't get as strong an economy either in this game compared with GC2...)
I'm curious. What happens when you take an agriworld from a enemy? Do their population start to starve to death after going through their food supply? Will the enemy start building new farms?
And will any world that fail to build new farms in time to replace the lost agriworld basically starve them to extinction and what happens to now empty world? does it get abandoned with infrastructure still intact?
Because I'm seeing that agriworlds is becoming prime targets of attack. Because if they get taken, you interrupt your enemy's plan of action to an drastic degree to ensure that population don't' starve to death.
Good point. And what about moral to said population. Another point about moral and food is that sometimes you conquer/acquire a planet and it ends up having more population than base food amount that that planet can support. Moral and resistance should be in the tank on a planet like that.
The net result is that most players will end up being able to build more cities but you won't (realistically) be able to have hundreds of food per turn anymore by those min/maxing the system.
Sounds good. I don't need more complex on this mechanism.
Question;
can these arable land plots regrow? Like if they are destroyed in an invasion, am I gonna have to deal with a big die-off, without any ability to stop it?
Alternatively, can you "re-build" these plots on planets where they are destroyed/bulldozed?
This is a good question - some buildings cannot be destroyed, but arable land can be destroyed by the player, so can invading legions destroy them? I think there are buildings that legions cannot destroy, but players can, I remember noticing that a couple of times. Otherwise, if there is no other means to produce food, planets with arable are even more important (especially once upgraded).
My guess is no, as I have not seen a "build arable land" project yet - though I've not been playing a lot. If this is the case, planet defense and garrisons should be a high priority for these planets.
invasion and spy strategy has changed.
destroy AT and watch a civ crumble.
Posted this on the the "Strange New Worlds" forum, but I think it belongs here also. Breadbasket planet on 3.0 Beta does not have any arable tiles. I would think it should have more of them than any other type. What is the point to +10% food if it doesn't have any food?
Well I have been giving the beta a crack and am quite disappointed with the way farming works now. With the pop cap and and VERY limited farming you can do, a tall build is all but a dead strategy. My first game I went malevolent/wide and was happy enough, but currently I am trying benevolent/tall and hit a roadblock 60 turns in with 3 planets maxing out on just 25 pop. I can work around the farming restrictions but the pop cap is just cruel.
On a little side note, been trying to play around with a privateer with no luck. Upgraded an admiral to "defend" my borders but every action seems to be an act of war ie attacking ships/starbases in and out of my territory is a hostile act. Is it just bugged or am I doing something wrong?
Also, any chance implementing destroying cities? I have all these excess cities I am burdened with now as I try to switch to a wide build
"Upgraded an admiral to "defend" my borders but every action seems to be an act of war ie attacking ships/starbases in and out of my territory is a hostile act. Is it just bugged or am I doing something wrong?"
Admirals aren't like Privateers. They're treated as normal warships. Only Privateers can freely attack without war.
Yes you are correct, I meant upgrade commander. However if you read the previous sentence (which you did not quote) I did mention I was using privateers. Apologies for the confusion
I guess that I should have been more clear. When I said "only Privateers", I meant Privateers that are not in a fleet with non-Privateer ships. Only Privateers (or fleets of Privateers) can attack without war. You need to remove the Privateer from any regular fleet for it to work.
I was just using a solo privateer trying to snipe pesky constructors/starbases in both my territory and neutral space. The game wanted me to declare war every time which seemed off to me. I haven't used them before but from their description I thought this was their whole purpose. I was just trying a bit of variety. Not that it matters a whole lot as the AI practically gifts them when trading.
"I was just using a solo privateer trying to snipe pesky constructors/starbases in both my territory and neutral space."
Well that's odd. I use Privateers every game including current game with 3.0 and they work just fine. :/
I am a newbie to the GalCiv world and Crusade is what I have.
This all sounds really great in theory , but I have not been getting any arable land tiles.
I attempted to build a Food Distribution Center on all of my planets, but with no food to distribute, oh well.
I gave up as I started to lose all my planets.
I changed to the Yor just because they do not need food!
The Yor were getting a bunch of farms on ever planet? WOW!
Is this a negative logic bug? i.e.) Synthetic's get farms and Organics get none?
I would have to say that no farms and no food seems like a major bug to me?
A) Make food a trade item.
Give Organics a Green House Achievement (one per planet)?
They were very successful at preventing surplus food!
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account
