Thanks for enlightening.

Guess I either played it after they've fixed it, or haven't played too much.

As for metacritic, I think I'm quite reluctant towards them, because in many cases I don't exactly understand how and why they "appraised" certain game.

Especially when no alpha label is presented, yet game is far, very-very far from being "fun" (or "stable"). And good luck telling anything negative about it anywhere but in reviews - tags now are moderated and some well-deserved ones are removed and forbidden, because devs are "offended", and posting anything negative (even if polite) met with banhammer.

So it works both ways, I think.

Guess I never played it to extent it deserves anyway... When GoG will be selling time to play games?

Sorry, I haven't read all of them.

So you think "shovelware" or "premature release" shouldn't be organized into group, informing other gamers of potentially broken software or "not so trustworthy developers/publishers"? Some teams should spend more time on polishing their software, not on witchhunt for angry gamers.

Let's agree to disagree.

We use tags (not game-related, though) to tag anything, including problematic areas and I think censoring that game-wise is, well, rather oppresive act, because until Valve changed their policy, I think only three or four games were tagged as badly made, yet, apparently, not so badly to be removed from Steam.

Currently I see no point in tags because all info is already present on game's page, including type, genre, or anything else, making tags to be redundant and feature for feature sake.