In fact just cop the total war ui and graphic design as well and you are golden.
Just think of how cool that would be.
"troll mentality" or "helpful and constructive criticism"?
I'm here because I care. It's better to have people express dislike than to have people fawn over the worthless nonstop. Elemental did suck, did you play it?
The answer is "troll mentality." There is nothing helpful nor constructive about Reply 21.
While I cannot know your motivation for certain, I doubt this; evidence strongly suggests otherwise.
You are welcome to express your dislike, but don't insult us by claiming your motivations are pure or your comments are helpful. if you feel the game is worthless, you are wasting your time...unless, of course, you enjoy getting negative feedback such as this one.
My reply 24 also was not helpful nor constructive either, but it wasn't intended to be. It's goal was to point out how unhelpful, destructive, and ridiculous Reply 21 was.
I agree that Elemental was not a good game. I agree with your right to dislike (and to express your dislike of) Fallen Enchantress. I agree that helpful, constructive criticism can be a good thing. What I can't agree with you is that tearing something (or someone) down is helpful, constructive, or evidence that you care.
You realize there already is one right? The king arthur series is essentially total war with magic, mythical creatures and heroes
AND it has champions embedded in units as well! I highly recommend the King Arthur series to everyone, it's great fun but its replayability is very low. I got maybe 30 hours out of the 1st one.
I strongly disagree. I was saying that Stardock's formula and/or the implementation of their formula failed them, strongly. This is very true.
Were you there when everyone was kissing Stardocks ass following the release of Elemental? Is that helpful?
touche. To retort; my motivation is pure, and my comments are much stronger and more helpful than yours. I am fine with negative feedback.
I disagree with your appraisal of Reply 21
I stated that the game was poor and then stated why it was poor. I didn't tear anyone down (in any tangibly unfair sense) in the slightest. Stardock knows that putting out good products will help them out. In the past they have shown a tendency to have a difficulty ascertaining the honest quality of their product. That is where we must help them.
This game has improved to the point where I would now rate it a solid 7/10. That is still pretty sh*tty.
There, I gave an honest appraisal.
sounds good guys. I'll check it out.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account
