Just want to keep people's expectations in line.
We are talking about a beta so let me walk you through some of the pain you can expect:
There will be crashes
The team has been working hard on making FE the most stable beta release we’ve done before. However, it will crash as this is the first build that will get widely tested in “release” mode as opposed to “debug” mode.
In particular:
(1) Loading games within games.
(2) Starting a new game within a game.
I spent today recoding parts of this and it “works on my machine” but accounting won’t let me ship my machine with the game.
Balance Balance Balance
We have a long list of balance changes that still need to be made. And let’s face it, a little balance change can change the game dramatically.
Performance
Anyone coming from War of Magic will be happy but we still have a lot of areas to go. If you want to maximize your performance, you’ll want to turn off pedestrians (the little people in the cities) and disable outlines. Those two cosmetics eat up a lot of frames. However, if you have the horsepower, you’ll be good. Make sure you update your video drivers just to be safe.
Anti-aliasing will definitely also slow things down horrendously depending on your config and resolution. The game is going to default to your desktop resolution. So if you’re like me at 2560x1440, think twice about turning on 8x anti aliasing.
Graphical Glitches
Anyone who has bought a PC game in the past few months knows this is an issue that has gotten a lot worse in recent times. Until we all jettison DirectX 9 (this is likely going to be our last DirectX 9 game, sorry XP users) you’re going to have a lot of people with unusual issues that we hope we’ll nail down with this beta as opposed to with WOM when the first “release” mode distribution was the release version (the beta versions all had debugging code which covered up various issues). With FE, the betas are going to all be release mode distributions which means it’ll be like you just got the “real” version. It’ll be harder for us to debug but we’ll manage.
MEMORY
This is a tough one but we really want to keep an eye on memory use. If you can keep task manager up and look at committed memory in the process list, we want to make sure it stays under 2GB so that people running Windows XP don’t have problems (if you’re running 64-bit the game will use 4GB). The game is large address aware.
Content
DO NOT judge the final game based on the content of the beta. New spells, monsters, goodie huts and quests get added in every day.
However: We absolutely want to reduce the number of city improvements in the game. Fewer, more interesting city improvements is the goal so feel free to suggest how we can consolidate what we have to improve on city differentiation.
PLAYER differentiation
The tech trees are pretty similar between different factions. As modders can tell you, this is a content issue, not a game issue. Right now, the objective of the base game is to keep both sides reasonably balanced and let modders go nuts if they want. However, we do plan to provide more tech tree differentiation as long as it makes sense (i.e. no different for the same of different). This has been one of Derek’s battle cries that he has convinced me on over the months.
The AI
The AI plays the game 100X better than say what it did in WOM. But I’ve barely touched the tactical battle code (which is still enough to make the tactical battles 10X better than in WOM since they were totally horrible in that game imo).
What we’ll need help on is strategies you’d like to see each player take. Like in GalCiv, each player in FE has its own strategy. We’ll be talking a lot about how to make it so Altar plays differently than Pariden in a way that players will easily observe. If armies end up similar on all sides, we did something wrong and will have to work at it.
There will be NO multiplayer
While internally we have multiplayer, we’ve turned it off. The release game won’t have it either. The reason is that tactical battles would have to be rewritten to support it (MP code needs to be message based but the tactical battles all call directly to internal variables which makes it easier to have greater performance but it means no MP). We decided it would be better to have no MP than gimpy MP for FE. Don’t bother arguing this point as it’s already been hashed out endlessly internally and it’s decided. We may bring it back in some future expansion but no promises because rewriting tactical is a non-trivial endeavor.
Lots of UI stuff is not in still
We have a victory screen still to go in that’s a pretty big deal. There’s a bunch of other stuff that will go in but by all means, if you have a UI request, post.
Modding and Campaigns are disabled
The beta is a sandbox beta. You will have to have an Internet connection to play the beta because we plan to be updating the XML data online so that players don’t have to download an update to the game just to get a balance tweak. It is not copy protection or anything like that. It’s for our convenience. The end result though is that modding won’t work because it’ll be using our online data.
Beta Reporting will be provided
We will be providing how to report problems here: https://forums.elementalgame.com/forum/1010
There is no NDA
The fate of the game is in your hands in the most literal sense. Because Elemental: War of Magic got such a bad rap (fairly or unfairly is irrelevant), we realistically cannot do a lot of marketing because every article is going to start with “After the ‘disastrous’ Elemental: War of Magic, Stardock hopes to make up lost ground, is it too late?” type stuff followed by comments like “Elemental? Stardock should just give up and make GalCiv III!” The only hope FE has is for people who actually have the game to spread the word IF THE GAME IS GOOD.
There’s no NDA so you can do whatever video you want or post about it or whatever. Do with it what you will.
Now, gotta get back to trying to figure out why particle effects are showing up in the FOW.
See you Thursday!
Its absolute blasphemy to make a PC game that doesnt have multiplayer. People play Consoles for SP. Anyone that has ever played games vs People instead of AI cant go back to just play AI... and guess what, thats about EVERY PC gamer.
Obviously I will not be getting my online guild, who all spent tons of time playing giant games of Civ 5 together, to buy E:FE now.
Do you think I'm the only one who is also not going to have their friends buy this guy due to no multiplayer?
Thormodr: To say what you have said about MP you must not have played Civ5 multiplayer or ever played MoM and had that desire to play with your friends. To think adding MP to E:FE would be limiting or changing the SP in anyway is absolutely ridiculous.
The idea that Stardock is a small company and lacks the resources to make this game into multiplayer is also ridiculous. It should have always been built from the ground up with multiplayer in mind.
Maybe this is why whoever owns the MoM name and license refused to let them make an official sequel... lets hope that there truly is a sequel made one day by a company competent enough to have multiplayer included in the final product.
To compare PC games without multiplayer to blasphemy is what is truly ridiculous. Hyperbole much?
Blasphemy is irreverence towards religious or holy persons or things.[1] Some countries have laws to punish blasphemy,[2] while others have laws to give recourse to those who are offended by blasphemy. Those laws may discourage blasphemy as a matter of blasphemous libel,[3]vilification of religion,[4][5]religious insult,[6] or hate speech.[7]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy
Also, to call Stardock incompetent on their own boards is your right but it does make you out to be somewhat of an ass.
Stop trying to make yourself out as a martyr and get over yourself.
This article was true 6 years ago and is true today:
https://forums.stardock.com/98074
Cool, and guess why me and 100k's of other people never bought or played galciv?
I can think of a game. ...wounded in the knee? Quite popular at the moment too.
GalCiv is awesome. Any version of it is just wonderful IMHO.
I prefer a single player game with good AI. That is my opinion and I have my reasons. But the reason don't matter as I don't care to persuade anyone. The point is that FE is fun. It is SP. Elemental: TBD might just have MP. That will be fine. I hope all of the 100,000 people that every MP fan seems to know will buy that version of the game. I would like to find some time to play some CoOp with them.
I would recommend this game to most TBS gamers. If you don't like SP because you have yet to play a decent AI, this may just be the game for you. This AI is markedly different. It isn't finished yet, but has the potential to really play the game well.
Oh, GalCiv2 is a fantastic SP game, but I have hot dreams at night of playing it in MP. Then it would have been the game I played the most, next to the grand EU3.
I do not like MP, To restricted. Being a father of three just finding time to play alone is difficult. I can't even imagine playing with friends.
I prefer a game with lots of depth and lots of different options. MP is for Games like Halo and Chess.
Galciv was wonderful and the AI was up to par. I can only hope that the AI for this game will be the same or better
If they can add a functional multiplayer then I don't see any reason why they shouldn't. I'll never touch it myself, but it'll nice for those who enjoy that sort of thing.
So what am I? The Exception to the Rule?
And must not be the only one...
Please, just make good AI for FE.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account