I was recently in a friendly--for the most part--discussion about gay marriage.
Now, I really have no valid opinion on the subject, but I will say that I don't think galaxies are going to explode, if gays and lesbians are given the right to say "I do". After all, in the words of the great country music legend/drag queen icon Dolly Parton, "They should have to suffer, right along with the rest of us."And besides, I really don't think it's my place to judge them. What they do is between them and the God to whom they so cavalierly flip the finger.
It's their choice, it's their consequences. At least, that's how I see it.
However, because I made the statement that I didn't really agree with the homosexual "lifestyle", I was called a "hater".
Several times. Often vehemently.
Now, why am I a hater?
All I did, was to express an opinion; I don't "hate" gay people. My sister is a lesbian, and a very good friend is bi-sexual. The father of another good friend came out several years ago, and he and his "partner" are friends of ours, as well.
I simply disagree with how they live their lives. Is that so shameful and intolerant, really?
I mean, I disagree with how drug addicts and theives live their lives too, but am I considered a hater for it? I don't think so....And really, don't gays pretty much disagree with how I live my life, too, having that yucky natural, vaginal sex with someone of the opposite gender, and all.....ICK!
In fact, over the years, I've been derisively called a "breeder" and a "straight"; like there's something weird, or perverse about it. Why are they not considered haters, for that? For having that intolerant opinion about me, and what I do in my bedroom? For "hating on" my lifestyle?Why do we allow political correctness to only go one way? If you understand what I mean, that is? Why aren't both sides held to the same standard of decorum?
And you know, while I'm at it, speaking of hate, do atheists ever attack any other religions besides Christianity? They can say the most ignorant, vile, hateful, despicable things about Jesus Christ and the faith He founded, but they never seem to tag other faiths as severely, if at all.
Why is that?
Maybe it's because we Christians are an easy target; we might defend our faith in a debate, but other than that, we won't fight back very hard. They know nothing will really happen to them, if they nastily belittle our beliefs. I mean, it's not like we're going to issue a fatwa against them or anything, right?
And, they say these mean, hateful things because--as we all know--we're the haters. Not them.
Funny how hypocrisy works, isn't it?
There are different groups who support the homosexual agenda and its goal of normalizing homosexuality as equal to heterosexuality. In general, Atheists are one of those groups.
Here you are, the self proclaimed Atheist, providing a good example of that.
Ya, right?????
Procreation is exactly what, as you say, our "medical marvels" are for. Almighty God made us male and female so that we would be fruitful and multiply. That's why its Adam and Eve and not Adam and Steve.
There are no good "medical marvels" that result from homosexual sex. You're big on science...don't you know about the medical consequences empirical science has revealed about homosexual sex?
Instead of the labeling...let's talk about truth.
You know what truth is ...don't you?
On that note, truth is Marriage a union of a man and a woman has been since the dawn of time, so it may help to remind the homosexualists pushing to remake Marriage into into something Marriage can never be.
ATHEIST - ONE WHO DOESN'T BELIEVE IN THE EXISTANCE OF ANY GOD ... and that certainly has nothing to do with HOMOSEXUALITY. This really is not a mindboggling concept, nor is it the calamity religious folk always try to make it out to be? However with that being said; the enemy of my enemy is a 'friend' ... wow, I can do aphorisms too. The problem with the RCC Inc. is that they have purposefully made the world and everyone on it (un-catholic) their enemy by self-proclamation and they refer to everyone and everything external to the Church as atheistic which gives the word no real usable meaning. They seem to do this simply because THEY want to ensure that the discussion (every discussion) is manipulated to seem to be about their chosen god which I (we) of course don’t believe in.
Ya, the numbers game. BT asserted that homosexuality has been around alot longer than Christianity as if that actually means something.
With marriage, it's about truth. That's why I said, "truth is.....". God's Marriage = 1 man + 1 woman..husband and wife.
You know I've asked the same question of the homosexualists. Why don't homosexualists leave over 2,000 years of God's Marriage alone?
Actually, in this case my truth comes from medical science. I already know the answer to my question, do you? It's science...have at it. What does the medical scientific truth tell us about the consequences of homosexual sex?
Hahaha ... just remember you were warned!!!
Good one. It's called natural religion and it does mean something.
Natural religion is simply the religion a man would be obliged to practice even if he never received a revelation from God. Man could know by reason alone that there is a God and by obedience to the natural moral law as manifested by conscience.
NEILO posts:
LULA posts:
Yes. Almighty God does have ownership over Marriage.
Marriage stems from human nature and thus its existence precedes both Church and State. That's why no Church can change it, why no State can change it and why homosexualists can't change or redefine it.
Marriage is a gift to us from God; Marriage is His institution that He's given to all of humanity.
We are created male and female for a reason...to naturally compliment each other...in Natural Marriage..both are necessary for the procreation and education of children...and thus the Natural Family.
Natural Marriage, a husband and wife are to be regarded as a single organism for that is what the words "one flesh" means. The husband, the male, the wife, the female, the 2 halves were made to be combined in pairs not simply on the sexual level, but totally combined. While two, they are one flesh, and this is the greatest mystery that only happens in heterosexuality.
Same sex couples devalue humanity becasue they proclaim that one part of humanity is unnecessary.
Same sex couples deny the unity of male and female in one flesh. They say it's not necessary.
God's Marriage or Natural Marriage is a reality. There is no such thing as homosexual "marriage". If it's same-sex; it's not Marriage. If it's Marriage, it's not same sex. Now, justices or legislators may rule that it is and people may vote to redefine marriage to include homosexual couples, but none of that can change essential reality. Imitations are not the real thing. Counterfeit money is not real money, and same-sex or counterfeit "marraige" is not real Marriage.
Again, God's Marriage or Natural Marriage is the coupling of a male and a female, two who are different and complimentary, not two who are the same.
So again I ask, Why don't homosexualists leave over 2,000 years of God's Marriage alone?
Such strange ideas you have about Christianity.
Actually it was Christ, a Jew, and the Apostles and disciples most of whom are Jews who are, as you say, the "architects" of Christianity.
Authentic historical, Apostolic Christianity is ancient Hebraic Judaism fulfilled and full blossomed, sort of like the development of an acorn to the oak tree.
It was Christ who restored and elevated Marriage to a Sacrament. Marriage is a contract, a covenant and a conjugal union of man and woman.
But I do agree with you at the time of Christ, marriage among all nations, including the Roman Empire, had lost its essential and original characteristics of unity, indissolubility and sanctity.
Ya, if you live under what His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI calls "the dictatorship of relativism."
I know that.
I've just explained why I believe it is.
Marriage is God's to own because whether you like it or not, believe it or not, accept it or not, God created each one of us in His image and likeness and wrote the Natural law in our heart.
God is still involved in your marriage by virtue of the fact that He created you, your wife and established Marriage and the Family. The deepest thing in man is written in his heart..it's called the Natural Law of God.
There are 3 distinct societies, domestic (the Family), civil (Government) and religious (Church) that answer to the particular needs of man. The Family was instituted by God when He proclaimed this law: "Wherefore a man shall leave father and mother and shall cleave to his wife; and they shall be two in one flesh."
The family is therefore a natural society and is necessary by reason of its end, which is the generation and the education of mankind. The family has its root and foundation in Marriage which creates, sustains and gives life to the family.
You can ignore God, mock Him or be a God-denier, but that doesn't change a thing about God or His Marriage.
What about if one has unconditional love for a sister, or an aunt, or a dog? Should the definition of marriage be changed, shouldn't they be qualified to get "married" if all it takes is unconditional love?
Two people love each other all the time, but we can't call that Marriage. There are lots of loving unconsidtional committments that are not marriage.
Another problem is that homosexual love is not and can never be conjugal love since a conjugal relationship requires physical complimentarity and can only exist between opposite sexes.
Again, the Family is the foundation of society and God's or Natural Marriage is the condition that gives rise to the Family. Homosexuality undermines Marriage by usurping its rights: conjugal relationships are only possible between a man and a woman.
Again, nature is narrow in its definition of Marriage. God's or Natural Marriage is the contract, covenant or sacred bond uniting a man and a woman. Marriage entails selfless dedication, devotion and sacrifice. Marriage and the Family are sacred institutions that foster the common good of all society.
Therefore, homosexual "marriage" cannot coexist side by side with God's or Natural Marriage because homosexual "marriage" destroys the integrity of God's Marriage by turning God's Marriage into a "species" within Marriage.
Society loses and is bad for people as it is no longer fulfilling the common good when Marriage and Family is redefined for whatever form the individual wants. It says the husband and wife, mother and father are optional. It says male and female are meaningless.
God's or Natural Marriage is the very best way to bring up children but Homosexualists say none of this matters and they are willing to change forever what has been the foundation of society for all civilizations.
Oh please, more games...this time word games. "Homophobic" is a homosexualist construct, an invention of the homosexual sophists. And the illogic of "homophobia" is blatant. Originally, "homophobia" was psychological jargon invented to describe a person's fear of homosexual inclination in him or herself. Homosexual activists took the term and redefined it as "hate and/or fear of homosexuals".
"Homophobia" is used as a rhetorical weapon that serves to define anyone who opposes liegitimization of homosexuality as a hate-filled bigot. It includes everyone who believes homosexuality is abnormal or wrong.
Please tell me the difference between "homophobia" and "non-homophobic" opposition to homosexuality.
I neither hate nor fear homosexuals. Homosexuals are people who are confused about their sexuality and even possibly addicted to it.
Homosexuality is a high risk, not genetic, changeable sexual behavior.
I look at homosexuality as a moral, ethical, economic societal issue relating to the common good of all. I oppose homosexuality because of my Faith, logic, common sense, and a simple knowledge of human anatomy...the body parts don't fit.
The Homosexual Agenda is promoted with the assistance of academia which indoctrinates, the media which promotes and the political which protects it.
What do you mean wasn't God wrong once?
There is no reasoning with you i see. No need for me to quote everything you said, i can sum it up briefly.I reject your view on life.
Some years ago when i first got a tattoo, i read a poster in the parlor that said "The difference between those with a tattoo and those that don't is that those with tattoo's, don't care that you don't have one."Iv'e always felt it applied to religious zealots as well (and often all Christianity), in that we don't care that they believe in a God, yet the reverse can hardly be said. I can hear the reply now, as mentioned elsewhere in this thread. "Why is it that Athiests only seem to attack Christianity?" Well, why is it that only Christians seem to care that i am not one of them. I have many friends that are Muslim and Hindu, and not once have any of them tried to tell me how wrong anything i do in my life is, yet the list of just family members alone who are Christians, that proceed to admonish my evil thoughts, would make the 10 commandments look like a shopping list for Walmart!Or perhaps its better put this way, the squeaky well gets the most grease.
So I went to the horses mouth and here is what it said.
The First Church of Atheism states:
Atheism is the belief there is no god the word atheism originated from the Greek (atheos), meaning “without god”. Atheists tend to be sceptical of supernatural claims, citing a lack of empirical evidence. And the best explanation so far for why the natural world looks the way it does is the theory of evolution first put forward by Charles Darwin
Evolution is the process by which a population or species change over time to better there survival in an environment, this is a fundamental part of biological studies. Some critics say Darwin’s studies were only a theory and have no creditability. When people refer to the theory in this way they suggest is only a guess. Evolutionary studies are not guess work but scientifically proven study. Some argue with the lack of a missing link disproves man evolution. Even though fossils have been found some religion say man was created by intelligent design. The alternate explanation to this is what if a race of intergalactic genetic engineers visited earth and decided it would benefit for a race of logical and problem solving mammals and genetically alter some of the primate species to create what we are today if enough people believed that then you have an alternative religion. Even with the lack of evidence and same theory can be applied to man was created in gods image (imago dei).
thanks
Reverend mark taylor Middlesbrough England
That is according to reverend Mark Taylor. Go ahead and send all your reasons BoobzTwo why his Atheist faith is not a real religion but masquerades as one. What do you think should be done to this church as you don't believe Atheism is a faith?
Depends where you are. In many nations around the world you will be targeted or if you go to the once great Atheist bastion, the Soviet Union, you'll find non Atheist religions were targeted quite aggressively especially Christianity, as in life and death.
PS: Personally I am hoping for little green men if evolution is one day proved to be in error.
Captain, i'm not sure i'm even getting your point. Are you saying that this "reverend" is meant to be one if us (an atheist) and as such your throwing his beliefs in our face and challenging us with it?Seriously, if my above summation of your point is wrong, then please explain it to me, because it all sounds very schoolyard to me.Why people seek out this need to belong to any one group baffles me. So, this "reverend" is part of a church of atheism? Good luck to him, just because i call myself an atheist does not mean i adhere to anything or anyone tagged as such. The good reverend can believe all he wants, by the sound of it, he is looking for something faith based still, i know as an atheist i don't want to be apart of a church of anything (well maybe Foamy!). Evolution is theory based in fact. Even today's Christians are a product of evolution. Take your every day religious zealot, the product of their parents, and their grandparents (and so on and so on) to believe single mindlessly in one view. With each generation the indoctrination starts earlier and is more ingrained in their daily lives. Take Terrorism in the name of religion as an example. If you look at the history of terrorism it has evolved greatly in the past 300 or so years to become a near every day part of life. Evolution is around us to be seen everyday, and requires no faith or baptism to be understood.
It was a response to BoobzTwo calling me out Neilo, see below. I went out looking for an official source and dug up the church. This is actually an older discussion that somehow props up every time and again when me and her talk. Frankly I don't understand why something so simple has to get so complicated.
That's nice, all very interesting. It seems EVERYTHING is becoming more and more extreme as time goes on from political parties to redefining marriage itself or it could be that things are just perceived that way.
You know that sounds suspiciously almost like intelligent design to me.
Check out this article from American Thinker. Are we in the Orwellian present?
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/04/christianity_or_thoughtcrime.html
"Christianity or ThoughtCrime"?
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account