RTSguru.com has published a list of the best space-based 4x strategy games, and has included Galactic Civilizations II and Sins of a Solar Empire in their list!
What do you think about the choices?
http://www.rtsguru.com/features/160/The-List-Best-Space-Based-4X-Strategy-Games.html
2) Sins of a Solar Empire – I’m including this one even if the developers didn’t/don’t really consider it strictly a 4X game, they prefer the tag of RT4X. Which, I guess I kinda get their point; it was a blend of RTS and 4X after all. Whatever you want to call it, Sins is a blast to play. While it didn’t have as many different races and other depth as most 4X games out there, that actually improved the multiplayer side of things. Most 4X games don’t really cater to multiplayer, since they make for some really long games. The fact that Sins was a RTS/4X hybrid, it was quite a bit faster to play and lead to some fun multiplayer games. Ironclad released 2 ‘micro-expansions’ and one full-fledged stand-alone expansion that greatly improved and expanded the game.
If the tech tree is complicated enough, some amount of scrolling will be necessary because it's impossible to fit everything on one screen at once. But being able to horizontal scroll to see farther ahead isn't the same thing as needing to scroll this stupid circular thing around (or apparently zoom it out, which I didn't even know you could do becuase it's not at all obvious from the screen that you can do that) in order to see what options are available to you right now.
SotS doesn't even let you see that far ahead in the trees, so what you're really looking at is just what's available to you right now. Civ 5 manages to do that with a single list on the side of the screen with absolutely no fuss whatsoever. There's certainly none of this circular scrolling around nonsense, and looking at that list doesn't take you out of the game to anther screen. It would be easy to do that in SotS, and it'd also be easy to optimize the existing research screen to display every option on one screen without that "looking around a room from the center" motif. That was just some UI guy trying to be creative and failing usability 101.
It really is. My day job involves a fair amount of UI design. As a result, I do not have a high tolerance for bad UI that gets in my way.
That you don't have to do it as often as some other games is no excuse for a poor UI.
I sure hope the devs of SotS 2 don't have your sense of denial. Also you're wrong, UI design is a well studied and documented field. There are absolute wrong UI decisions based on very large amounts of usability research. The research UI IS inferior in navigation and informatoin presentation because it takes what could fit in a relatively compact design with a known navigation pattern (horizontal or vertical scrolling, not that you'd need to do either in the early game given the number of techs available) and instead throws a confusing and annoying circular design at it instead.
Since SotS doesn't give you the complete tech tree like other games do, that isn't even a relevant factor. For what it's actually trying to present it does a very poor job of it. And even if it was a complete picture it'd still be doing a poor job of it because of how little of it you can fit on the screen at once due to the need to circular scroll and the amount of space being wasted on screen for that.
Really? You're arguing about UI and you don't know what the point of a UI is?
No, I was able to learn pretty quickly that I had to circular scroll. That doesn't make circular scrolling a good or even acceptable method of navigating the tech trees. It's far more cumbersome then the alternatives seen in other games (in particular with how it's laid out, a tabbed structure like Sins of a Solar Empire has would be a drastic improvement).
What do I want to see? I want to be able to jump from branch X to branch B without having to circular scroll through Y, Z, and A first. Most UIs make that easy either by simply having them all on screen or having simple scrolling or tabs to jump to the one I want. SotS instead gives me the annoyance of circular scrolling a few times until the one I wanted in the first place swings around into view. If I gave this UI to my dad, he'd quit the game and go do something else within 45 seconds. That's not a good thing.
Other people have kindly already replied to this pointing out the other areas where the UI is deficient. It doesn't do nearly as good a job of presenting information as it could or should. The research one is just among the most obvious examples.
If you want to see games with good UI, try anything from Blizzard. Those guys take usability seriously, and one of the reasons why WoW destroyed so many other MMOs over the years is that there was a three year stretch where WoW's UI simply destroyed everybody else on the market (and anywhere that the base UI was deficient somehow, modders took care of until Blizzard upgraded). It's only been recently that games like Rift have launched with competitive stock UI. The Civ 5 UI is also quite good, though the game itself has some issues.
Circular vs horizontal (and vertical often) is the same thing as far as I'm concerned. It's no better or worse, just different. As to it being obvious that you can zoom or not, RTFM. I mean seriously, that's the extent of your issues it appears, you didn't bother to learn what you can do with that UI.
Not a UI issue. A game design mechanic.
Confusing? Known navigation pattern? Seriously. I don't find it confusing, I find it nicer than the others I've seen, to each their own. But this notion that it's a flawed design is your own notion, not a fact. And since you didn't even bother to learn how to navigate it using the full set of tools available to you, it's a flawed notion.
Zoom out all the way. Again, you simply don't seem to know what you are talking about here.
Apparently you've never heard of a rhetorical question either.
Zoom out, activate names. Problems solved, if you had just bothered to RTFM, or you know, look at the icons on the screen...
Zoom out. Problem entirely solved. Yah you have to scroll a bit, but meh, same freaking difference in a horizontal approach.
No, research is not the most obvious example. Again, because you don't realize what tools you have available to use it. Sending ships is a bit clunky, I'd agree, but on the other hand, we're not talking about that mechanism.
Blizzard made a space 4x? Cool what's it called?
I love the 4X games. One game that I think should be remade was the extremely underrated game Emperor of the Fading Suns. What impressed me most about that game was a distinct history and distinct setting. It took the gothic sci-fi to the extreme and when playing the game you felt that you were in a gothic sc-fi setting similar to warhammer 40k. It would be great if this game were updated because it would feel different then a lot of the current 4x games.
I have gone to GOG to download some of the older 4x games including Master of Magic, Alpha Centauri, Civilvization Call to Power 2(Another underrated game), and Shadow magic. The graphics may not have been as good on them, but more things were done with the plot, espcecially in Alpha Centauri. The post in this inspired to do so and also to revisit master of magic.
Add me to the list of people who can't stand the SotS UI!
While SotS is just below DW, (my fav), and while i really enjoy the challenge of the 3D galaxy - I hate the circular tech 'screen.' I wish they would make it optional, and user customizable.. and give us the option to use a flat tech tree like in civ, or whatever.
I'm with you here. EotFS was (and is) a great game. It still runs on modern machines, though the interface is a little slow and it suffers the odd graphical or sound glitch. I'd love to see it remade, or at least updated, but I don't think that's likely in this age of fast-paced gun-fests. Fading Suns simply takes too long to play a single turn to be seriously considered by most devs.
There is a fan-created spiritual successor, Echos of Imperium, in the works over here.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account
