Hello, all; I've been reading this forum for a while, and have been studying the excellent tutorial found here. I'm on p. 5 at the part where the author talks about slicing the start menu for reassembly in SS. My start menu isn't exactly square like the illustrated one is, so I'm not very sure about how to go about slicing it. Is it safe to publish an image here of a work in progress, or is that not recommended for security reasons?peace,
Mally
Edited to correct link
Short question; am I better off making my stretchable borders in 4 layers, or 1 while working on my PSD? The whole stretching thing kind of eludes my understanding so far. I mean, when I looked at my stretchable PNGs imported in SKS, the center 1/3 of each piece stretched vertically, but not the outer 1/3 on either side of it. I'm sure there must be a way to adjust that, but I haven't found it.
peace,
Stardock Office Desktop? Is this something new I missed, or a typo?
RedneckDude;
Wow, I get to answer a question for a change! It's not too new, but Stardock Office Desktop (the pro version you often find reference to in Google searches merged into the standard version, at the standard version's price of $US 50 in early December, 2009) contains all these tools:
What I'm thinking you will need to do is set them so they are right up on the edges of the image on the right and left, then just barely covering the top and bottom edges, so most of it will stretch up. You really just have to mess with it a bit to see what works best with each skin.
Never mind. Dumb question. I'm not importing all the PSD layers into SKS, just the PSD pieces from 2 layers.
Just be careful you don't fiddle with the wrong thing or..... Poof! Zap! Zowie and hmmm... left over parts?
I get your point, Uvah, and you're right; but I like your sense of humor. You funny!
I have a couple of new questions. I want to include an animation in my start menu. In it, the steam will be the animated bit. Is this done by creating an AVI? How do I photograph the background so that there isn't solid color around the steam. In this image, it was photographed in front of a white background.
Here is the start menu so far. I created the 3D bits in Second Life. I created the rest of the graphics in Photoshop.
As always, I welcome your comments as much as your answers.
Edit: I just got a idea about the steam. I could make a brush, and vary the density, size and shade of grey I use when I use it. Anyone see any problems with that? How many images would I need to make by hand with the tweens being made by PS?
Very creative! I like it!
Thanks, Xiandi; Tried a batch of drawings, tweened between each consecutive pair of them, the result was, to say the least, disappointing. In my head, ideas always sound so much easier to execute than they turn out to be. I'm on the right track with the brushes I've made, though. I didn't like including so much of the locomotive in the image. It's a start menu, I thought, not a wall paper, and it was really only the stack and steam I wanted.
Yes, there is a question; at what point do I add the animation? Is that part of the original cutting of the image, or is that added at a later time?
well, that depends.... if you are going to include the stack in the animation, then add it later, if you want only the smoke to be the animation, then include the stack in the start panel. The animation is added separately/differently than the start panel with the 'Start Menu Animation Builder' in the Tools dropdown in SKS.
This thread alone is a good tutorial. We should refer folks here.
Xiandi, then in light of what you said, I think I won't make the stack part of the animation. Doing so would make those animation files at least 2x larger, I suspect. I am using the very top of the stack to make it easy to register the steam layers so they are all in exactly the place I want them in relation to each other, so they don't jump around. It's good to know about that Start Menu Animation Builder tool for the reason that Uvah and others have mentioned. It is jam packed full of answers to the kind of questions another total noob to skinning with Stardock's tools might also want to know. I hope they will join in with their own questions, too.
Mally, if might want to dissect Xiandi's "Pressurized" Windowblind https://www.wincustomize.com/explore/windowblinds/6928/ and my Steampunk Windowblind https://www.wincustomize.com/explore/windowblinds/6961/ for examples of steam on the start menu.
By a not-so-odd coincidence, k10w3, your Steampunk blind is what I've been wearing since getting into skins a couple of weeks ago. And Xiandi's Pressurized is also really beautiful to me. The problem with the later for me is that it changes the text color of an application I use multiple times every hour I'm awake (Mailwasher) from black to very pale gray, but it doesn't change that app's background, nor does the software give me that option. That results in too much eye strain for this old fella. On Pressurized, I can see the steam easily, but after using the grunged version of Steampunk, I don't see it. I wonder if it's a later version than the one I have? I don't know how to install the wallpaper if I have it, and I don't see steam in either version's JPG at the page to which you pointed me. I like your blind so much, anyway. I really have to work hard to prevent it from influencing my own work. Steampunk is a genre of design that has not evolved a lot since it's beginnings, what, in the early 80s? It doesn't give a designer a lot of design elements; gears, gauges, Edison era light bulbs, and goggles seem to be staples, though.
The grunge version doesn't have steam, just the original.
Like you said, it's a genre that hasn't evolved much, so I wouldn't worry too much about the influence. The only twist I've seen on classic Steampunk is in a game my son plays, called BioShock, where it's all underwater, so rather than the warm colors of orange and brown, it's in shades of blue and green. I watch him play for hours, and I'm thinking the entire time of how I could develop that into a windowblind.
Karen...what would a 21st. century Steampunk look like? All digital as opposed to gears, pullies and such. Check it out...maybe a variation on a Cray Supercomputer. Maybe an AI (artificial intelligence). Attribute it to my warped imagination.
I don't think that would work -- the whole idea behind steampunk is "what would the 21st century look like if digital never happened and steam was as far as technology went?" hence the contrast of elements of the past with what is modern now. What you're imaging is sort of a reverse steampunk, where the styles and ideas of the 1800s are infused with way-future technology. Like, what would Queen Victoria do with an iPad?
Oh, gosh. I'm really good at making faux pas; I'm sorry I assumed you were a dad, and I hope you'll forgive me, Karen.Uvah; Steampunk is supposed to be a mix of Victorian era mechanical stuff along side of futuristic high tech stuff. The latter isn't common place in Steampunk, though I've seen images of computers (PCs and notepads) in beautiful Steampunk cases, finely detailed jewelry, USB thumb drives, but even those things rely on old gauges, gears, watch bits, plumbing parts, etc. Finding an idea from the future isn't easy, but it's been done. The communicator became the cell phone, so there's hope for a transporter, an accurate universal translator requiring no gadgetry, and a replicator.
Not a problem. I'm not the most feminine person in the world, and being the bread winner in my household, I run the place like I'm the dad anyway.
Alright, and this is a stupid question, but WindowBlinds isn't listed in my add and remove programs list, and I can't find anything like an uninstall.exe in the software's directory. So, how do I go about installing the trial version of it before installing the full retail version?
Dave
The trial version I think will allow you to upgrade to the full retail version. Check the splash screen or perhaps there's a button someplace. Don't mind me. I'm just bein' stupid. But yeah ^^^I think that works.
Well, I wish it were that easy. Adobe, and Microsoft have both figured out ways to keep their products secured from the hands of pirates and still use the trial with a key sent to you by email after payment, but you can't upgrade the trial to the full version of WindowBlinds or the other Stardock products. Neither will CCleaner uninstall WB. Stardock developed a piece of software called Impulse in it's later years. It's required, it appears, to use Impulse to uninstall the WB trial.
In April of this year, Stardock surprised a lot of the gaming world when they sold it to GameStop, a giant gaming distributor who now own a way to distribute their games and game updates, but also to help make those games more secure on the web. GameStop users are up in arms; they're worried that small independent games will be smothered out of the market & that GameStop can raise the price of game distribution to new all time highs. I'm not saying it's all as simple as that synopsis, but after several hours of trying to find out how to uninstall WB, that's the gist of what I learned. I have yet to learn where I can download it. It's still freeware, I hear.
When I find that link if someone hasn't already posted it, I'll post that link here to make it easier for someone else to find.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account
