This is on a I5 imac. 4 gigs ram, and mobility 4850 (LOL). And this piece of crap runs crysis 2 very smoothly at 2560x1440!
Pics:
Video as evidence:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mU6lF-uEQU&hd=1
And yes, that is me, and my voice.
I read that it actually has lower system requirements than Crysis. I'm waiting for my new rig to show up hopefully this week before I buy Crysis 2. Looks great in the pics. I'm on a Dell Laptop Mobility 4500/5100 series and I play all the new stuff. Got it all hooked up to keyboard/mouse/monitor/sound. Cant wait til my new desktop with a Radeon 5870 gets here.
I wouldn't be surprised Crysis 2 does have lower sytsem reqs., it has a lot more of a console feel to it and plays like it. It's pretty, and it's good, but not as good as Crysis or Crysis Warhead. It almost feels, and plays like a port. When I saw the interview of one of the devs saying, or maybe I read it hear, about how they felt meeting console requirements was holding them back. This game doesn't feel like a step ahead at all. It feels like a step back game-wise, but a little better graphics.
Oh, and there are lots of quirks that you associate with a port that are in the game, namely in things like graphics options. Also, every time I am killed, I have to reload the game for some reason I lose melee, and there isn't any first -person perspective for driving vehicles, which I've done once. The levels also feel smaller and more restrictive. Oh, there also isn't any quick save or load. Pure Console BS.
As an Edit note, if I had known EA was the publisher, I probably wouldn't have purchased it. IT's one reason I quit playing the Battlefield games, etc. Seems like every thing EA touches these days, they ruin for me.
Only good thing with running the game on THAT computer is that my own rig will smoke it!
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account