Happy 2011 to all the Sins players out there! It's been quiet on the Sins' front for a while now due to other business, but as I promised late last year, we're working on a new Diplomacy update for everyone. The update will be released in beta first due to a number of changes we're making in the game, probably in the next two weeks. Once we're happy that everything is working as expected, we'll release a final version for everyone.
So what's going to be in the update?
Currently the Pirates can either be non-factors or incredibly nasty early on given how their upgrade system works and how their fleets are composed. If you get a streak of bad luck, you end up with Pirates that have an insane power curve that makes the game very unfun, very quickly. To fix this, we're switching the Pirates to a series of fixed fleet compositions and upgrade paths. What this means is that early on, if you get tagged with a Pirate raid from bounty, you'll find them annoying but easy to deal with. As the game progresses, the Pirates abilities and toughness will scale over time based on the amount of credits they collect from missions, bounty, their planet, etc. The Pirates will no longer simply scale in power, either! We're giving them unlockable special abilities that will give them an edge in late game situations. On the flip side, we don't want situations where in the late game, a player can send a massive Pirate fleet at another player by simply dropping 100 total credits on bounty. So we're adding in a new system that will scale back Pirate raids levels if the bounty isn't high enough to warrant a big deployment.
Basically, the Pirate bounty system will be a bludgeon, whereas giving the Pirates missions via Diplomacy will be a scalpel.
One thing that would make the AI sooooo much better would be simply to disallow AI carrier cruisers from following blindly the rest of the fleet into starbase weapons range. That is all it would take for the "hide behind starbase" strat to become much harder.
Hmm, I don't disagree and we'll investigate it. I think that stuff is tied into the fleet dynamics, however, which may complicate matters.
Just talked to the guys about this and it would not be easy to accomplish. We'll have to pass on it for now.
teehee so i have a question will i stillbe able to use modd vor 1.10 or no
Yarlen, can you at least allow modders the ability to modify AI ourselves then? My buddies tell me that it is hardcoded and we don't have access to it???
We will greatly appreciate any new input into the game. Sins still have a ton of untapped potential, wasted by imbalances and optimisation issues. It warms the heart to see you still care
Ok... What about the Vasari AI starbase construction logic. The Colonizer/Starbase Constructor AI seems to have issues building starbases while the dedicated TEC/Advent AI seem to get star bases up much quicker.
K here a good question what about the fastest speed that is talked about in the impulse video for sins?
They said theirs a fastest speed after faster.
knowing there isn't that is false advertisement lol. faster is getting to slow
Is it coming with this patch?or later patch?
I haven't seen speed that comes after faster but if it was it would be really hard to manage all aspects of battle (microing). So I would say faster is fast enough.
The reason for that is budgeting. The AI will often spend its money on higher priority things and leave its constructor sitting in limbo waiting for funds to build the starbase. Because the Vasari starbase requires more money to deploy, this means the migrator is often waiting for longer.
Personally, I think we've hit the limit of increasing the game's pace through these sliders. If we still want to make it faster, the best way would be a new slider that increases the game update rate (similar to the +/- option in singleplayer) by factors of 50%.
Actually, the game would play very similarly to Starcraft if you were hammering away at 4x speed.
How long now until the release?
Hi guys, nice to see Sins is still receiving attention and being improved, this is awesome.Looking forward to getting some decent amount of free time to spend with a new and improved old favorite!Couple of questions,1) Any chance this is on the cards; Quoting "Like the Whirlwind"
x1.5 or x2 should be manageable, though.
Is there any chance that the patch could also include a fix to eliminate the mesh error problem that Trinity purchasers experience when they try to play online?
Last night a guy tried to join a 4v4 several times and those of us who were in the game chat channel (where you can chat while waiting for your game to fill) felt badly for him and didn't have any way to reach out to him. (After you get the mesh error, you are sent to a blank channel where no one can find you, and not the Lobby channel.) It was kind of sad. I like to tell people how they can fix the problem by directing them to the sticky thread in the Technical forum, but sometimes you just can't find the person in the chat Lobby.
You guys gonna fix the empire tree from jumping around so you can scroll and select things properly in battles?
THIS is the primary reason multiplayer is so empty.
this absolutely MUST be fixed.
I wouldn't call it the primary problem. Most of the time I can in fact find the people in the Lobby and tell them how to fix it. I think the real problem is that 98% of all Sins buyers never contemplated trying to play it online. Either that or for whatever reason this game just didn't appeal to the online multiplayer RTS crowd.
Still, a mesh issue will immediately turn any prospective multiplayer gamer off. This is definitely something worth looking at and fixing.
I've reinstalled Diplomacy on my new computer and I'm quite dispointed to see that my Diplomacy version is still not yet in French language whereas it has been from several months available in French in stores.
Any date for this ?
The patch could be also the occasion to put the French version on the servers, at least I hope...
Can I start a new game this evening or should I wait a bit for releasing (beta) patch? I play a match three-four days
I think there is something else going on in the engine besides just budgeting. If I create a dedicated starbase constructor with the exact same Vasari cost structure then the AI builds the starbases just fine much earlier in the game.
I also tried using the Vasari colonizer/starbase constructor dual role in my mod and ultimately gave up on it and added a dedicated starbase constructor to avoid the issue in my mod as well. The more expensive deployment does not seem to cause an issue with the dedicated starbase constructor.
Regardless the reason, It's worth looking at as it severly gimps versus Vasari gameplay fun in Single Player games.
Sorry no, this is far outside the scope of what we're currently able to do.
Not sure what you're referring to. The Vasari starbase has a tech upgrade that allows it to build faster. That's by design since it's mobile and designed for offense.
The game is about as fast as it's going to get. Going faster than it is now dramatically increases the risk of crashes and desyncs in multiplayer from what I understand (you can already adjust the speed in single-player).
We haven't heard/seen this before. We'll need more info in order to look into it.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account
