I think this article at PCGamer is a little slanderous and overtly malicious. Gratefully the problems he complains about I don't even experience myself. And I have usually been a skeptic here. Articles like this one are only designed to hurt and not help. The article is disguised to help buyers by steering people away through blown out of proportion accusations and statements. I believe the game needs work but not on par with the writers complaints. I don't believe its a disastrous launch. That statement is overblown and an outright a lie in my opinion. I am not a fanboy but I know a good game with potential when I play it. It just saddens me that there are players out there with chips on their shoulders or vendettas.
http://www.pcgamer.com/2010/08/25/elementals-disastrous-launch-stay-well-away/
Actually it would be more : you like or you dont the Concept of the game more than the game itself right now.
That is true. And Stardock is one of those companies that will continue to work on their product (not all companies do this after maybe one or two patches.) However this trend in the gaming industry is not a good thing. And if we as consumers keep buying these 1/2 finished products and then have faith that some time in the future the game will be up to par then gamining companies have no incentive to release a complete product.
Now I will keep supporting Elemental because I do see the potential and I trust Stardock to support the game and not just leave it hanging in the wind.
So (since you are referincing the poll and all), if I am in the 54%, how does that put me in the minority? Please explain this logic. And what relevance does this have to the conversation?
Damn, how could I have missed that Wintersong? Thanks for the clarification?
I wonder if its possible to make MoM using this engine?
http://www.pcgamer.com/2010/09/02/elemental-war-of-magic-review/
PCGAMER reviews elemental and gives 70
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account
