SupCom:FA is the greatest game ever and you should get it

Nope.

If you have to ask, then you'll never understand. Return to your foolishness. 

Not lookin for one.

As with all the previous iterations, Multiplayer is where the game shines. Even if you don't like Multiplayer, skirmish is still fun, especially with the new AI improvements. Sorian (a modder who worked on the Sorian AI for SupCom/FA who now works at GPG) improved it quite a bit. He even made an "AI Overlord" which controls and coordinates all present AIs in the game, so that the AI will fight against their enemies together, instead of just acting independently from each other.

It's Steam so... dud.

This is what he said that you replied to:

"I'm not going to buy a game that promises to be a successor to the game I love above all other games and falls ridiculously short."

It's pretty clear he liked the original game but not the sequel, which he describes as falling "...ridiculously short."  How from that you gleaned he "...seemingly liked..." the sequel is beyond my ken.

It's supposed to be similar, that's the point of a sequel. It's what is expected of a sequel. Why the **** would you mess with something successful. How is it narrowminded? If they want to do something new, do a spin-off, that way they don't tarnish the series. Why is it wrong to expect a similar experience to the original in a sequel?

They wouldn't have that problem if they hadn't completely F***ed up SC2, now would they? And it doesn't help that everything they've shown so far of K&C makes it look like a reskinned SupCom2. King=Commander. They like to mention how the game will have big huge units that dominate the battlefield (remind you of something? *coughexperimentalcough*). And they're always going on about the "Epic Scale" etc, etc.

If K&C isn't awesome, you're darn right people will be disappointed, because that will be three duds in a row for GPG. Granted, Demigod is actually pretty good, but it still had a bad launch, and terrible support from GPG (Stardock's support for it, on the other hand, is excellent). I have yet to see anyone anywhere refer to K&C as the "true Supreme Commander 2."

And who chose the publisher? I'm sure there are tons of companies who would have been willing to publish SC2.

First:

Go reread your post #28.

OMG_Teseer said in post #22: "I'm not going to buy a game that promises to be a successor to the game I love above all other games and falls ridiculously short."

You quoted that in your reply #28.

I responded to your post #28.

If you meant to reply to what OMG_Teseer said in post #17 then please do so, not another post where he specifically and clearly said he thought the sequel fell ridiculously short -- which certainly sounds like he didn't like it.

Second:

You selectively quoted him in his post #17.  Here's the entirety of that post:

And what he said in post #17 doesn't obviate your fallacious argument Strawman -- no one said the game changes because the name changes.  The point has been false advertising, trying to ride the coat-tails of the original and failing to do so, unmet expectations, etc.

And, as an aside, thanks for the interesting opportunities to exercise my rhetoric, as it gets rusty with disuse!

I'll say it again. If you don't understand, you never will. 

I'd say keep bein' a scrub, but you don't need me to tell ya to.

Never wanted an argument. Never wanted to talk to ya. Just making sure you understand you're a scrub.

Yes it does. 

When you're a little douche-cock, one is inclined to return in kind.

So you were trolling then?

Not surprised.