although i haven't posted here for a while, i do occasionally manage to make a little time for myself and drop by long enough to see who's ranting about what. most recently it was yesterday morning just before being engulfed for the next 12 hours in the tedious labyrinth of winmerging two infinite groups of barely unique files.
during that ten minutes or so, while enjoying the perfect lunacy that is teabag nation, i noticed someone postulating something about the president as follows:
"...if Obammy is impeached..."
and i've been wondering since what that 'obammy' thing is all about.
here's a link to the discussion in question (visitors be warned: it is a foil hat zone); scroll down to reply#5.
The question is can we afford two more years of his polices?
Let's get one thing straight. I don't give a fuck about Obama. In fact, I think he's worse than Bush. So you can go ahead and tear into Obama and the democrats and liberals all day long, and I DO NOT qualify that as being mean.
What I do qualify as "meanness" is what Americans as a people are doing to EACH OTHER. This whole -left vs right/ liberal/conservative thing is a crock of shit and the sooner you learn that the better off you'll be. What I mean by "meanness" is that there used to be a time when folks could have differing views and still act like adults and meaningfully debate their differences with dignity and respect.
But that's not happening anymore. The whole notion of having respect and dignity for someone you disagree with has gone out the window, and the result is adult children like Glenn Beck shouting to high hell about things they know nothing about.
And the ultimate victim of this? Will be you. When you lose the ability to respect another human being based on differences of belief, then all bets are off.
I believe, personally, that on the current course American politics are taking that it will only be a matter of time before a "strong man" character comes along who will usher in a fascist state. And having an intolerant environment of the likes that exists today will only make it all the easier!
Singling out only one side as responsible for this 'meanness' is part of the problem, Arty. But I feel better about you after this:
thanks.
now we know where they show up on shortbus google.
here's where they appeared on the first page of the standard version.
although you're very fluent in the american flavor of english and and contemporary american politics, it's not at all surprising you'd find this puzzling. try googling wikipedia's articles on minstrel shows, the mammy archetype and "the jazz singer" (1927) starring al jolson.
obammy is my mammy?
Good one.
Very insensitive & un-PC, but a good one.
Good thing his name isn't Obani... he'd really have a problem.
KB are you suggesting Obama is a white guy in "black face" like Al Jolsen? That's not nice.
I would not use a childish insult (that is also derogatory to handicapped individuals) like that on you, but then I do have a larger vocabulary. But good to see you are still a liar, since here are your links from where you made the allegation:
http://niggermania.net/forum/showthread.php?237-Obammy-loves-his-KFC.http://www.chimpout.com/forum/showthread.php?s=3e7ee69d32dab1028a597ceb20dcd4c5&p=529750#post529750
And which when you blow up your "poof", you can see the links you try to lie with are not the same, in fact one is not even the same site! LIAR. Again, why am I not surprised?
I also see you like to insult those less fortunate than most of us.. But then that is your way, right? Insult those who cannot defend themselves on equal footing? Typical liberal democrat.
What else can we expect from a mental midget with a single syllable vocabulary and single digit IQ?
Did we afford 8 years of Bush policies?
Not from me.
No we couldn't, do you think more spending will be better?
Wish we didn't have to but there are some things we just have to live with, like 8 years of Bush, right?
Ever heard of learning from mistakes or are you the kind of person who needs to get burned several times before you stop putting your hand in the fire?
Chuck you know it only confuses the left when you disparage Bush. It take the wind out of their sails when they say "but, but Bush did it". They can't deal with their own hypocrisy.
That is the most ironic (hypocritical?). They vilified Bush for 8 years (going on 10), and now they excuse the current kid with that one!
Wrong. I'm just saying you can't compare 8 years with 2 years.
True, Obama is doing more damage in 2 than Bush did in 8.
if only.
that's a relief huh?
i've no basis for making that sorta determination
you've still not explained why you referred to obama as "obammy,"
well there ya have it sportsfans.
after all these years and, according to drguy, layers upon layers of deliberate prevarication, non-truths, mis-truths and falsehoods, i've been caught typing red-handed by none other than the net's most brilliant, dedicated and persistent anti-lie crusader and must now admit the following:
1. in my reply #79, i'd inserted a graphic image purporting to be a screencap of a google page on which i'd claimed to have found two specific links i'd pasted into my reply #69.
2. said links do point to two separate remote domains as intended neither of which was identified by name.
3. i modified said google page image, using a highlighted arrow to indicate where each of these two links was located and could be found on the page in question; i also added a third highlighted arrow to indicate the google page number (1).
4. in fact, one of those links indicated on the google page image was not the link i originally posted in my reply #69.
i sincerely apologize for having so egregiously misinformed the public.
having confessed and apologized, i feel obliged to expose one more lie conveniently overlooked by ol dr"honesttogod"guy:
1. referring to his reply#72 he states the links i provided in my reply #69 were located thusly:
2. in his reply#85 (partially quoted at the top of this post)--he affirmatively repeats his original claim the links i provided were "101st or 1001st" links.
3. both allegations were factually false from the jump; repeating them evidences premeditation compounded by malicious intent
although i didn't attempt to mitigate my own offense, i had no intention to deceive anyone and would not have deliberately weakened my argument had i realized i was pointing a different link than i'd previously posted. i was in a hurry and perhaps a bit careless. once again, i apologize.
i truly wish i could tell yall my accuser is merely a pompous self-serving asshole but since we're being totally candid and absolutely honest with each other i feel honor-bound to qualify that characterization a bit more accurately in that he's a lying pompous, self-serving asshole and an unapologetic habitual hypocrite who was proven a flagrantly unrepentant plagiarist by none other than little_whip
Liar. I stated the original claim as a flippant one, not an exact one, and did not repeat it.
I fail to see why you continue to lie when the facts which are easy to check show your lies. You are pathetic, At least try to lie so that you will not be caught so easily. Liar.
Logic 101 would do you good. Since I never claimed the links you gave were exactly those numbers, and never repeated the claim as you lied about, you continue to lie. Again, and again and again. I fail to see the logic in your feeble attempts to lie your way around the fact that you are just plain wrong. Since you have yet to produce those 2 links in the original post, we do not know if they are 21st, 54th, or 101st, now do we? So I can say they are anything, and so far, you have yet to prove a thing (other than you lie). Once you produce documentary evidence of where they fall within the google search, at best you can say I exaggerate. At worst you will have to admit I was being conservative. But you will do neither, as you seem to be able to do only one thing. Lie.
Another lie.
Tell that to the judge. The evidence is overwhelming since you have been caught in so many before, and yet again.
No, she never did. Nor did you. But you can lie all you want to. Your credibility is shot, so now you resort to smearing. I guess you have to do something to lick your wounded pride in being shown to be a liar and fraud again. Nice try buzz bait.
apparently i do have problems with words of 2 syllables; not a problem of comprehension though. take the word "moron". i know what the word defines. identifying you as a total moron proves i fully grasp the concept and use the term accurately in a sentence. my problem is an inability to completely ignore your rabid moronic blather.
from here on, i intend to redouble that effort.
in the mean time, here's an updated screen cap of the very 1st page google returns for the search term "obammy".
same two links only now one of of those i originally provided has moved to the top of the page.
Kids, kids, settle down. This is a very unseemly exchange.
except by needlessly re-quoting your own moronic statement from my reply (in which it was germane and relevant though no less moronic).
every time you make that assertion, you're causing poor ol bob taft and barry goldwater to commence spinnin in their graves.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account
