i hate how the media leans towards the demcratic party. fox news i truley think is the most fair and balanced i mean look at it they always have the republica and democrat battleing it out, but on cnn and msnbc its always two democrats agreeing and your not getting the other half of the story.
Oh, I see, you just like being a whiner?
Ok, I see I can get your goat by pointing out the truth about you. And of course most of it goes over your head. I suspected that you were all hat and no cattle and you are proving it. Keep at it. I can see why Daiwa finds you so entertaining. It is so easy to see you tripping over your lies, backtracking and trying to justify the impossible.
Go ahead and keep it up. I will love letting you make a fool of yourself (oops! Must be another insult since I said the word fool).
Keep proving Twain's maxim! And continue to show us how lite bright you really are. LOL
So lets see - calling you by your initials is an insult. Pointing out your childish insults and behaviors is an insult. Disagreeing with your insults is an insult. Anything not an insult to you Mr. Know it all?
No, I guess that would be unrealistic. However it's clear you've exhausted everything in your entire repertoire since every sentence is a virtual repeat of something you said no more than a few replies ago. It wasn’t very clever then and it certainly doesn’t get any better in the retelling.
Talking to you is like listening to the headline news channel that’s on a continuous loop. You’re fine for the first ten minutes until you come back to the top of the loop and the same old stories just repeat over and over again. The lights are on but nobody’s home.
Clearly to you whoever gets the last word is the “winner”. Again how childish can you get? As I said in my last reply that obviously went over your head, I will most certainly get bored soon, particularly if you aren’t even clever enough the change up the insults. However, if “winning” is oh so very important to you then I guess I’ll at least make you work for it for awhile. After all it’s not particularly challenging to respond to your adolescent prattle.
Wrong - Wouldn't. Why should I respond to Mr. Know it all? I just enjoy seeing you make an ass of yourself. ALl I have to do is jiggle the worm and you snap. But of course then since you know it all, you know what I think and what I am going to do next, right? Even god does not know what is not, but apparently you do! Shazaam! You are so good mr. know it all!
Tell me what I am thinking right now! You can do it in your sleep!
I don't know what you're thinking now but if you're like most rabid right wing nuts then at some time or other you have given a number of insane conspiracy theories some serious consideration.
Like this one where Michele Bachmann gets all worked up about the census and WWII style "internment camps". Or is this an unfair characterization of Ms. Bachman's position promulgated by the liberal MSM? I suspect not since it appears on your hallowed Fox News on none other than the sainted Glenn Beck Program.
So you are saying you are delusional now mr. know it all? Well, who am I to argue with mr. know it all.
Here toady! Another bait for you to snap at! Tell me more that only you know mr, know it all!
Or should that be Mr. Scarecrow?
What conspiracy theory? What there was not factual? I didn't see or hear anyone pontificating any conspiracy theory at all. Just facts. Nothing stated there was not true.
Your choice of so-called crazies is very telling about your viewpoint. Obviously, anyone who disagrees with your point of view must be a crazy and not "normal" according to you. Typical left-wing attitude and completely contemptable. In order to achieve a truly objective opinion all viewpoints must be considered, weighed fairly, and evaluated. But then anyone on either extreme of political thought is anything but objective and therefore always wrong, not to mention contemptable.
So you believe that anyone who denies the religion of man-made global warming, demands to establish for certain the birthplace of our President, I am assuming your use of "teabagger" must be a slur about those who choose to exercise their rights of free speech and to demonstrate in public, people of religious belief, must be a crazy eh? Seems to me you believe everyone of differing beliefs than yourself should be denied their rights and discredited. You'd make an excellent Nazi.
Doesn't surprise me you can't see the obvious bias in certain news outlets. Personally I watch, listen, and read as many as I can and form my own objective opinions. Based upon what you posted I seriously doubt you do the same. I don't believe or trust anyone who is either far right or far left, they're two sides of the same lunatic coin as far as I am concerned. We know upon which side of that coin you fall.
Oh, and you should know that I spend every single day just hoping you'll post something in a thread just so I can reply. My world revolves around your dumb ass.
A very mature and intelligent response to be sure. I would expect nothing less. Very typical of the extreme mentality.
You reveal yourself as the emotional yet intellectually lacking sheeple that you are.
Children! If the media is biased why do we never get what we want?
Where is the universal government run healthcare for all based on medicare?
Why are we still occupying two foreign countries?
Why has their been no regulation of wall street since the Roosevelt administration?
Im not even sure the democratic party has a liberal bias! Much less the media. Which is controlled by huge multinationals who have a vested interest in getting less regulation and more free market ability to gobble up more media outlets. Give me a break.
Since when does the media make the laws? Your questions are silly as the media has nothng to do with the making of law.
Some of the Democrats are far left, others are not. Some Republicans are far right, others are not. All of the major media outlets have an editorial bias, that's obvious to anyone who watches and/or reads them. Most tend to the left and some tend to the right, but they are all biased to one degree or another.
See Doc, your doing it all wrong. Try Masons method. I think he's found a nerve. Liberal elitists don't like their intelligence questioned
Maybe you need to work for it...how about giving that a try instead of wating for a hand out. Radical concept, I know.Where is the universal government run healthcare for all based on medicare?
Dead hopefully. Instead of 90% paying for their own health care and the other 10% who can't or won't, why not make sure they have a job to contribute instead of take. Send the illigals home. As for the people that can but won't... sucks to be them.Why are we still occupying two foreign countries?
Because many of those nice people with turbans and no respect for women still want to kill us, sorry I meant cause man made disasters. They don't realize, yet, we are in possestion of the man-god Obama and his message of hope and change hasn't reached them yet. I wonder if you are as similarly concerned about the 12 million illegals occupying the US, with no withdrawl date scheduled.Why has their been no regulation of wall street since the Roosevelt administration?
Maybe because it didn't work then, and kept the US in a depression (most of the rest of the world had recovered) until WWII brought us out. Of course your free to tell us exactly what the government has been able to manage efficiently and effectively.
I have come to expect that from the children of JU. Spoiled, self important, stupid but knowing all. And of course they cannot hold a debate without sinking into slurs.
Yep, just like children. The kind that make abortion a compassionate term, not one of death.
The rest of your post is just wasted space as this is the most telling. Those who cannot tell the difference between congress and the press are indeed selfish and uneducated. Just because both are very liberal these days still does not make them synonymous.
And fortunately there are still a lot of rational people left in this country that know how to discern "tingling leg" bias without having to ask Papa Doc to tell them.
Oh, I have gotten a few from MF. And of course abreviating his name is a slur in his book (I guess he fails to grasp the fact that the president and body odor are synonymous as well).
Mason is far more articulate than I. And patient. When rational thinking liberals post, I respond with discussion and debate, and enjoy the back and forth. WHen children with keyboards do, I do not have the patience to reduce my posts to single syllable words for their understanding, so let them just rant and curse like the spoiled children they are.
DG has basically used a technique of quasi non sensical free association coupled with 1984 type mindspeak that simply cannot be reasoned with. Childish but effective.
Mason however is obvious to be precisely what he is which is basically a salt of the earth type guy. In fact I really hate to have to be againsnt someone like Mason because to me he is precisely the kind of person that I tend to argue for. However he still has drunken the right wing cool aid that really is only to the benefit of the rich which oddly enough is more precisely the class to which I belong.
Politics does indeed make strange bedfellows.
This is exactly the sort of asinine comment that bugs me about extremists at either end of the spectrum. I am neither right nor am I am left. As I already stated, both extremes make me nervous and are in my opinion quite insane. Common sense always falls in the middle of these extremes. Anyone who subscribes to either extreme political viewpoint is a damn fool and simply too lazy to think for themselves. No true thinking person will ever find themselves aligned with an extreme point of view.
Your money means nothing here and impresses even less.
Really? So you don't think the people have a right to know for certain their President was actually born in this country and is actually Constitutionally qualified to serve in the office? I think it's a valid question and deserves an absolute, all doubts removed answer. Our Constitution spells out very specific requirements for holding the office of President and the citizens have every right to demand positive and absolute verification that someone actually meets those qualifications and are not in any way crazy for doing so.
I seem to recall many left-wingers trying to say that McCane was not qualified as he was not born in the U.S. I don't recall seeing any left-wingers claiming that they lacked common sense or were crazies for saying so. Turned out they were wrong, and the so-called "birthers" may also be quite wrong, but they still have every right to ask the question.
That's the problem I have with you extremists. You somehow feel that anyone who disagrees with you is either crazy, stupid, or simply doesn't have a valid point. More often than not it's the extremist who is wrong, stupid, or crazy. The overwhelming majority of people are not far left or far right, they fall somewhere in the middle where common sense prevails.
But birthers, deathers and vaxers, yeah, they're crazy. But then so too are truthers.
In his case it is also a lie. But then I doubt he writes anything that is not a lie.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account
