High Towers for the win, folks, the game is way more fun, as it doesn't allow a single reg, or other demigod to down in tower before level 5. The whole point of towers are act defensive shield, not someting you can walk just walk thourgh or down single handly, after all the towers are you last line of defense..they need to be strong (in fact I would argue high just isn't enough), change your settings..its the way the game was ment to played.
High towers severely skews the balance of demigods IMO.
Regulus wtf
Oh, and please announce that you have towers on high to the new joiners. I can't stand finding out the hard way.
The whole point of towers is to act as a defensive shield early in the game. They're more like your first line of defense.
its not my clone
this guys sees it!
only tower high make the game meaningful
but ofc hard to get approval from kiddos used to get erebus and oak and ignore them
im very happy that finally more ppl see the truth!!
thnx god
By the title i tghought you meant real men need to be high to play.
I absolutely agree with this topic. High Towers are where it's at. Because no matter how great a Regulus or whomever you prefer to play. You can NEVER be in two places at once.
In fact I play oak 90% of the time, as such high towers are technially not in my favor, they most certainly are in reg's however...other then that, high towers work great, but we all know the towers range should increase with level investment in towers FP..sadly it doesn't however...which completly skews the game for ranged players...I don't neccisarly have an issue with this.but..some kind of counter for towers/ranged I think would be boon for the game.
If a lone Regulus is downing your towers before level 5, you are doing something very, very wrong. It takes forever to kill a tower as Reg.
Real men code mods and distribute them to disable Towers entirely so whimps can't hide behind them.
if only we could code mods..
yes i greatly agree with this too
Haha, I see what you did there! Anyway, in terms of object placement within a level, such as Towers, we can - those objects are added to the 3D Model that makes up the level rather than being a physical part of the 3D Model itself. You could also, technically, add additional Towers if you were so inclined.
Oh, high towers.
You haven't played against some of the aus demigod community then
im all for high towers ... normal towers r for noobs....IMO
Yeah - high towers is very common....
Try high towers, fast spawn and low war rank... Epic games that can go ages...
i wasn't aware people played without high towers, whats the point in having towers if they're not going to hurt?
I like high towers to, it lessens the whole "lets put on wand of speed and chase someone through their base till they die near crystal and die a second later to towers/npcs so they get no cash and I get paid for suicide run". Plus it does make the game go a bit more longer unless superior teamwork occurs.
i take it you dont like it when i own u like that?
i agree, in my lobbies towers are set high almost all the times
Ha, I dont mind towers either way. Just delays till i get a bit of armour.
Ill rephrase.
High TOWERS?
You haven't been part of some hiliarious pre-match lobbies with some of the aus demigod community then
your demigod is the last line of defence not the towers. hes there to defend the towers. if a tower is stopping the enemy demigod then i ask what are you there for?
this setting sounds more like a crutch.
IN the pantheon you do not get to choose, so whatever is the default I's say that is how the game is supposed to be played. That means normal towers are.
And DGs taking out towers are not the problem in any game. If you do not defend your towers or take the other team's towers out fast enough you deserve to be pushed back. Improper defending or attacking will not mask your poor playing. I do not see any real advantage to setting the towers to high in that case. I am with zxzxza.
whats that? fuzzy logic?
TOWERS like in every age/game/situation are there to defende
demigods are there to fight, end of story
if towers wouldnt defend why even exist?
Towers are there to defend but they should fall against the focus of DGs. You are there to push the other DGs back so your towers remain where they are. You can even fight under the cover of your tower if you need to defend the tower. This way the tower helps in pushing other DGs back because they should run when you have the upper hand like this.
'DGs are there to fight' is such a meak statement because it could mean anything. DGs could very well fight to defend your towers. He could also fight to destroy enemy towers. In no way should the towers ever take over the job of the DG. Defending is the DG job, the tower is just there to guarantee every team some control of the map in the early game. If you play so poorly that your towers fall very quickly then your playstyle may need some rethinking.
Buffing the towers will just mask your poor playing because they last a bit longer, but in the end the real men will defend the base and push back enemy DGs themselves. Good players do not rely on coocked up settings.
lol even in sicily you dont get to choose if you can say yes or no to mafia
in your logic then mafia is right
gg
This is pretty much the amount of stupidity where I refuse to argue any further. Well done.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account
