http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150394
It says PCI Express 2.0
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128387
and this one says PCI Express. Will that be a problem?
Please read my post COMPLETELY.
I do make it crystal clear that one MUST do a full in place re-upgrade after booting into the new mobo/chipset, etc. This guarantees that Vista/7 will check every driver at every level to make sure it is correct.
It only takes 20 minutes and your computer will thank you for it.
Goo, this is not a difference of opinion.
I am talking about facts. You know, things you can test. Things you can look at and realize how things are working.
You're talking about opinions. Computers do not run on opinions.
The internet is a vast place with many resources. If you would like to find and post sources showing how temperture increases cause failure in consumer CPUs, then do it. If you cannot do so then accept that your opinion is extremely vague and has nothing to do with reality.
Also, please show me something indicating how processor temperture effects gaming performance. I suspect you will not be able to post anything because there are no reviews, studies, or tests which indicate this.
In fact, I'd love to see someone post a review of a water cooler block (note: note a full water cooling system) which actually shows it achieving tempetures lower than what is possible with a good air cooler. I suspect you will post nothing. I have not seen any reviews which claim that water cooling blocks are better. Usually they are only on par with the air coolers, but they cost more.
Hell, really Goo. You just claimed that most air coolers don't keep a CPU below 70 degrees during peak usage. Just FYI, at 70 degrees most motherboard are going to just shut the fucking system down because that is crazy hot and is in excess of what Intel says their processors will tolerate. So what you are claiming here is that Intel knowingly ships cooling solutions which will fry their processors. I think we would have heard about that one by now, don't you?
But hey, while we're on the subject, let me post some air cooler test results. Let's see - this one shows that AMD stock coolers do not exceed 60 degrees Celsuis even when a system is overclocked. Or how about this one, which shows that a huge number of air coolers, none of which reach over 50 degrees?
Haha this thread has made me laugh. I think You all have valid points and just to be on the safe side, I'm gonna format the hard drive and start over, and probably pick up a better cpu cooler down the road. Thanks for all the help everyone
This indicates that your assumption is wrong.
I find it funny too. I hope it was helpful too.
If you don't do overclocking "Better" means "Less noise" in situations like this. So if you're not annoyed by noise from the cooler, there's no need to look for anything other than what you got.
Put your money on a GPU cooler first, because the AMD stock cooler is NOISY.
Let me suggest:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835186016
along with:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16835186021
It makes for a darn good and quiet combination at an affordable price.
There's also the accelero twin turbo which is pretty much the same as the above 2 combined. Newegg don't seem to have those though.
Facelessclock, again I will admit my error… the temperature in my mind’s-eye is definitely off. But will stand by the fact that Intel‘s stock coolers do not cool the CPU as effectively as a aftermarket cooler and as a gamer I would not use a stock cooler. And I am speaking during peak times, not idle… I suggested liquid cooling because it’s a fantastic way to keep the CPU temps low at a low cost. In regards to the increase in temp decreasing performance… when I find the article I read on it I will happy to PM you about it.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account