Edit: I added an idea of how I'd like the issue fixed at the bottom of this post. It's basically the same thing I posted in one of the posts below, but I suspect nobody in IC/SD has time to reap through these walls of letters, so I copy-pasted th idea here for easier reference.
This is a hard one to fix. Every other matchup is more or less fine, maybe requiring some minor balancing (nerf dmg of that thing, buff hps of the other, etc.).
However, there is a serious problem when you're a Vasari assaulting another Vasari player, who got 'entrenched' (as in - has a deployed starbase with 2-offence, 3-defense +some other upgrades).
You see, when a Tec/Advent player assaults another player, they can use the specialised torpedo cruisers against the defender. On the other hand, the defender has no use of these units. So this is a tactical difference that can be exploited.Please note that torpedo cruisers have a superior range to that of a starbase, which means that the defending fleet has to move out of their starbase's shadow a little to defend it. If the starbase is orkulus, it will float in and engage the cruisers. Still, if you pay the same amount of money on torpedo cruisers as the defender paid for the starbase (with upgrades), that fleet will easily wipe the starbase. So it's a low tech-level hard counter there.
Also, when a Vasari player assaults another faction's gravity well, they can construct their offensive starbase out of the defending one's reach. Two options are available for the defender:- move out and kill the starbase hatchling. This is very similiar to defending against torpedo cruisers, only the defender doesn't really have to do anything, because an unbuilt starbase doesn't pose a threat yet.- wait for their SB to get built while preparing defenses. You have to understand that building a fresh 3k HP, 149dmg Pulse cannon naked starbase is by no means a game won for the Vasari. They still have to take out the enemy starbase and the defenders can bring torpedo cruisers to eliminate the threat. So this is no easy win for the vasari, but more of an all-or-nothing gamble.
The only screwed up match is Vasari vs Vasari. Simple reason - everything that works for the assaulting team also works for the defenders, but:- the defenders can have minefields ready- the defenders can have a beefed up starbase ready that will mow down the one being built by attackers- the defenders have tactical structures set up- the defender's (upgraded) starbase moves and the attacker has to set up its own in the same gravwell.The last point is what makes Orkulus viable against Tec or Advent starbases, but it kills the offensive capability of it against an already deployed Orkulus. Why? Because the attacker's starbase will still be under construction when the well-developed defender's one drives by and starts tearing it apart.
All of this means the assaulting Vasari have absolutely no trick thy can use against the defenders that the defenders can't use against them. An assaulting TEC/Adv can use torpedo cruisers against any defenders without fear of having these used against him. A Vasari assaulting Tec/Advent can build his orkulus out of the enemy SB's reach. Nothing like that works in Vas vs. Vas match.
Some say Kostura is the attacker's advantage, but it's way too far in the tech tree and way too expensive to be viable here. Reason: everything one needs to down a starbase in any matchup except Vasari vs Vasari (torpedo cruisers, Orkulus) is limited to tech-level-4 bracket, while Kostura is tech-8. That and lots of other reasons mentioned in the spam below make the Kostura more of an end-game trick than a counter to a deployed starbase.
Hard one to fix... any ideas?
EDIT : my idea of fixing the issue. Please note that I DO NOT want a torpedo cruiser for Vasari.Balance doesn't require everyone to have exactly the same tools.
Protective Nanites - research, tech level 3-4 in fortification tree."Jarun Migrator is equipped with a payload of special nanites which temporarily shield the Orkulus Starbase from heavy defensive fire when deployed in fortified enemy systems."Requires: enemy Starbase in orbit (built or in construction).Duration: Construction period and up to 120 seconds afterwards, if a hostile Starbase is present.Effects:- max Shield Mitigation increased by 5%- Shield regeneration 10 sp/sec - Enemy Structure damage reduced 100% (game mechanic wise; that would result in 50% actual reduction applied to damage coming from defender's structures)My reasoning - such an upgrade would be of little use against TEC or Advent, because the shield mitigation bonus and regeneration are minor, plus you are going to deploy your orkulus out of their SB's reach anyway. The damage reduction would help the starbase survive against a defender's starbase early, but the Protective Nanites would fade off before you are able to develop the Orkulus enough to cause any serious damage to the defender's Starbase. Without at least level 2 attack and level 1 defense, an orkulus cannot scratch a half-developed argonev (try for yourselves, a lvl6 Vulkoras does better!). So this damage reduction would actually be effective only against Vasari, because wherever you start building your Assaulting Orkulus, the defending one is gonna start pounding on it just a few seconds later.
This is just an IDEA of the type of tweak I'd like to see. Something that doesn't say "Boosts orkulus offensive capability against another vasari" (cause that would be retarded in a number of ways), but something that would sound sensible in general, yet truly shine against a defending orkulus in particular. And no torpedo cruisers for Vasari please.
Hey guys. I don't think N3rull knows that other ships (such as ships with less than 6 armor) can be hit with nano disassembler. Let's not tell him and see how long he takes to figure it out!
You should probably notice by now that your uncanny level of hostility is so over the top that it can't be taken seriously. But then again the internet is SERIOUS BUSINESS, so I won't get in the way.
i'm going to have to admit that made absolutely no sense to me. ships with negative armor take increased damage, i believe. whats the point?
Crash, he is not making any sense.He got into a discussion about how Vasari can assault a developed Vasari starbase and even though I explained (in detail) what happens if armor goes negative, he still thinks I do not know.Somehow he seems to think this is a thread about how useless in my opinion nano disassembler is.It is not useless. But this thread is about starbases (oh no, how could one figure that out?? by reading the OP?? No way) and N-D doesn't help much against a well upgraded Starbase, which happens to have the most armor of all objects in the game.
Mr. Bobucles is talking crap because his argument about nano-disassembler failed (it's sad people with little mathematical knowledge really believe they can explain game mechanics). What more can he contribute to the discussion if not completely pointless comments about nothing.
You overestimate me. I'm just grabbing a bag of popcorn and enjoying the show. I didn't actually expect this thread to degrade into a civil discussion. That ended somewhere on page 1.
Well, i started at the end of this topic and went back to the first page. The furious argument was funny but interesting too. I agree with the maths of N3rull for the hull, believe me, they are totally correct.
Nevertheless, i don't exactly agree about two points :
-efficiency of flaks against vasari bombers. I don't have a lot of experience in flak against bombers but if flaks truly concentrate fire against bombers, i am not sure they get after the same spacecraft but maybe after the same squadron so the damages can be spread among the entire squadron, contrary to fighters who focus fire. I am not sure but i wanted to say that i need a little bit more to be convinced about the efficiency of flak against bombers. A replay maybe ? Nevertheless, a few squadrons can eat your bombers very quickly and if you wait for air superiority to launch your bombers, the SB would have got pretty close of your fleet by then.
-I am an advent player and the Advent battleball don't make miracles : if you have not been taking off the shields before with your bombers, vas SB are a nightmare : even with shield regenaration, it is hard to keep your guardians alive (i generally lose them if i don't retreat them). Against the hull, you can get out somehow if you have a fleet big enough and some destras crusaders. But 12 K hull + fighters + shield + a real human managing the thing, well, i would think twice before attacking. It remains easier than attacking a starbase as a vasari but still.
But the one and only matchup when the intended anti-starbase technique is absolutely negated is Vasari vs Vasari. The attacker simply can not use their own Orkulus effectively. First it builds for hell knows how long and the defending orky is gonna fly up its ass. If you have a dozen overseers ready, it may survive. Then, when it's built, it is a dozen times weaker then the defending orky. It is the attacker who is defending against overwhelming odds in this scenario, not the defender.You can bring double the amount of torpedo cruisers for double the damage and survivability, but you can't start building two orkys in the enemy gravwell. You can run away with your fleet, but your Orky can't run away from another orky (moreso, its ass is not covered with frontal shield deflectors while the chasing orky has them in effect).
This match, Vas vs Vas, negates the intended anti-starbase strategy of Vasari and does not introduce anything else in return (after all, he's Vasari too. He has all the tricks you have. Just don't start off with Kostura again, it's been mowed down five times already). The only thing Vasari are left with is spamming stuff (as in: abusing the fact there is only one Starbase and you can throw as much as you want at it). I am completely positive nobody in Ironclad intended SPAM as the only option in any matchup whatsoever.
It's nice of you that you continued the subject
In the
Thats why this whole thing is so screwed up.
Nano-Disassembler actually makes the situation worse, not better. This is because it allows the defending Vasari player to eat the offensive Vasari SBs for breakfast, however the offensive player can't use N-D against the defender very well due to the VERY high armour rating..
The only way you can safely use an Orkulas to attack another Okulas is if you attack him BEFORE he fully upgrades his SB. However, this is anything but a solution.
You nailed it again.
So please IC, pimp my Starbase!
Well not really. But at least make it a viable option against another Vasari. Or give the attacking Vasari a different tool, something he can use to his advantage and the enemy can not (like torpedo cruisers are for Adv or TEC, like mobile starbase is for Vas against Adv or TEC).
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account