Two Months ago, America validated Martin Luther King's vision. Today, Liberals, the Mainstream Media and the vested racial animosity groups drove us back 45 years.
2 months ago, America elected a black man as president. Disregarding his race as a factor in stating they wanted a change. But for the past year, Liberals, Race Ambulance Chasers, the Mainstream Media have worked doggedly to destroy King's vision. And to turn back the hands of time so that instead of being able to judge a man on the content of his character, they are forcing America to judge him based upon the color of his skin.
Many people marched with King back in 63. Wanting to keep alive a dream that many of us shared, and still share. And some of us want to see yet to come. But it is not now. Today, America turned a deaf ear to King and instead marched backwards to the days when the content of a man's character was secondary to the color of his skin.
For many of us who have fought long and hard to realize that dream it is indeed a dark day. It is not the fault of Obama, for he is a man who ran for and was elected president. It is the fault of the liberals and Mainstream media that must force us to think of him not as a man, but as a black man. It is very frustrating to see 45 years of work swept away with the new racists of 21st century America.
It is indeed a sad day for America. I only hope that we can rebuild from this set back that has beset us. And one day, the man elected president will not be known as "the <insert qualifier here> President", but as the American President.
While the phrase "Liberals and the Media" indicates that those that are racist are in those 2 groups are racist, it does not say that all in those groups are racist or that all racist are in those groups. SO why do you feel compelled to define yourself in the subgroups that are racist?
I think he would be heartened it happened, but 45 years is not overnight for any man.
THANK YOU! NOw you get it! And if you look at what the media has been doing, at what the liberals in power are doing, you will see exactly that! Oh, not with every word. Even a Grand Kleagle mixes in normal speech in his hate speech. But when they talk about "The best SPeech for a black man.." or "look what he has done as a black man..." they are putting race first and are racist. Acknowledging that Obama is black is not racism. Qualifying what he does or says with "black" is.
And then he fumbles the ball on the goal line! I am not talking absolutes. I am talking anecdotes and opinion of what I see and hear. And I was not talking IR, but closet racism. IR is a form of overt racism, and for themost part has been erradicated or at least made illegal. Closet racism cannot be made illegal (and I hope to god it never is) because itis thought,and even I do not want Big Brother to start dictating thought. But while we cannot outlaw it, we sure as hell can expose it for what it is. Can I look into your mind and see you as a closet racist? no. But I can see you as one (this is the royal you, not the personal you) when you couch your superlatives with qualifiers. Or couch your criticism in the same manner.
I should stay home and let you write this! Thanks for another very on the mark and clear statement of my point! I wonder why some do not want to read or understand it. Why are they trying to turn the argument to something it is not? I can only think of one reason. They are ashamed of it as well, and instead of trying to defend the indefensible, they want to change the debate so they can defend the defensible. And in so doing, excuse those they are ashamed of, and condemn those they do not agree with.
No, some are celebrating because he is black. More I think because he is liberal. And celebrating him is not repudiating King. Qualifying him is. As is the lame clowns in the media that think we should have voted FOR him because he was black. As El-D said, that is racism too, and worse, because it masks itself as your friend instead of confronting you for the ugliness it is. Again, you quote me saying this was not about the people celebrating him, and then you turn around and start talking about how I am condemning people celebrating him! I have to ask you, why are you not responding to what is written, and instead trying to change it to something else?
WHy did you put it that way? Why is he not the President who is a black man? Notice the order? King said judge based on the character, not the color. Character comes first, color a distant whatever. Yet you Said "Black man" first. Why? Are you trying to preclude me because I am not black? Are you trying to qualify what Obama will do or say by stating he is black? How many times have you heard "The Quaker who was president" or "the Catholic who was president". Both groups have suffered discrimination in this nation (albeit not to the extent blacks have), but JFK was a First. Nixon was a first. But first what? They were the first "President who was" not the first "xxx President". Except by those who wanted to excuse them for their (the ones stating it) prejudicial view of th perceived inferiority.
With the closet racism that still exists in this country, that day is far off. But at least if we expose it and bring it to the light of day, these vampires of society will eventually wither and die.
He was citing an earlier post, not stating he had heard it. But I would be interested to see what you heard. I did not hear the piece, but I have read enough of what passes as "news" from the MSM that basically stated the same thing. Remember Murtha? And he is supposed to be so enlightened! He is a closet racist and a perfect example of what my blog is all about.
Everyone from Texas is an elitist!
But how many times have you heard Bush called that (not that it is a fair comparison either way)?
But I will tell you that there is nothing wrong with saying "Black Man is President" if you dont mind not living up to King's dream. And as long as you dont use it as a qualifier either. How would you feel if you heard "The Black Man did ok on the test"? Or how about "that sounds pretty good for a black man"?
Insidious when you cant help but qualify a man. A great man in that one of only 42 that have been elected to the highest (or second highest including VPs that ascended) to the most powerful position in the world. Yet there are those we hear daily that have to qualify it as if to say "ok for a black man". That is not King.
Notice the order. King was a man of the cloth, so instead of saying "all men" he said "all of God's children", and then the second part was their tans or prayer caps. You quote it, but you dont understand it. You heard a few black announcers say "black president", yet google it and you can find many Journallist writing it. Again, why are you or any of you going to the celebration? I said nothing about the celebration in the blog. I stated explicitly what I was ashamed and saddened about. Not a bunch of yahoos dancing because their side won (democrats in case you are gasping). They do that every 4 years. The players change, but the dance does not.
No, this was about the Media and the LIberals qualifying every thing they said, and forbidding either by direct statement or covert intent, any comparisons to Presidents 1-43.
You are also racist for excusing someone because of their tan or prayer cap. Or of falsely adulating them for mediocre accomplishments because of their race. Both of which were done and are being done by Liberals and the media. America will not (the vast majority). They will judge him based upon his deeds as if he is a Man who is President (as it should be). But for the closet racist, they will excuse any miscues because "he is black".
We agree.
How did you read this far and still not understand the article? It is not about Obama, it is about those who feel he has to be treated "special" because he is not a man who is president who happens to be black, but a "Black man who happens to be president"? These same people are the ones who have to put race into everything. Because it excuses their racism to think that when all is said and done, they are still somehow superior to others by virtue of nothing more than how they were born.
Thanks MM! I really appreciate that coming from one I admire.
No, they got schooled by the liberals who want to maintain racism for their own reasons. Teach them that the American Reality is when he was elected. Not when we were told we had to look at him differently.
And here ladies and gents we see the same tired old classic dodges! Dont debate/discuss the issue, turn it around to what you want to debate and discuss! Thanks to the local gad fly, we see that now he tries to put words (but since it is my blog, he cant change them - too bad buzzy) in my mouth, instead of looking into that mirror and seeing the ugliness in it.!
I would not say that of you! You should not characterize yourself so. There are far more that really are worse than you (Col Klink comes to mind as does Dabe and Wise Fawn). You really need to get out more, and look into some mirrors.
Excuse me? Please mr moderator show me where I stated "THis is a fact"? Or perhaps you do not understand what a blog is? That would explain it since your liberal clown brothers in DC dont understand, nor so the idiots in the MSM.
This is my opinion. Get it? no, probably not. Do you need names, dates and events where I worked for racial equality? You mean like Kings March (when I was but 7)? I guess that was the only time anyone ever worked for racial equality, right? Do you ever stop and think how small minded and bigotted you look like? Do you even think? I doubt it. Or you would not be so stupid as to try to pull your tricks here, after you have been beaten so many times with simple logic and facts. But as I have said several times of you (see, this is a fact jack), you cant debate facts because you never present any or have any to back up your warped opinion of yourself.
That is why I love getting your comments. You are so easy to beat! I only have to point to my words and show you that you are tilting at your own self made windmills so you can beat them, but not discussing or debating anything I said. because you cant, and now everyone can see that for themselves.
For the record, I never said the comment posted by MM was from a liberal, now did I? But I dont expect you to understand that, or anything else that does not fit into your predetermined agenda.
I once appologized to you for stating something wrong about you. While you have made several of the same errors about me in just 2 posts here, I dont think I will ever see an appology from you. You are not man enough for it.
And people wonder why American education sucks.
2 Generations.
And of course only a blind man is not going to see that you have a big nose and I have big ears. And the question remains. Am I Big ear Dr. Guy and you Big Nose Stubby? Or am I Dr. Guy with the big ears, and you Stubby with the big nose? The answer is important and says a lot.
No one said it offended anyone, now did they? And who said it was not part of American history? But the question begged by the response is it "the most important part because it is about blacks"? Is it?
You were going good until you got here. No, black is not different. SOme are, just as some whites are. I have more in common with a lot of blacks than I do a lot of whites and vice versa. It is our culture. Where we were raised, how we were raised. There is no difference, outside of the cultural ones. Color is not a difference. it is a description of physical attributes.
I should have stayed home and let him write this! He totally gets it and more eloquently than I can write!
Notice how liberals like to think they are the smartest people opn earth? first it was clinton, andnow it is Obama. And of course conservatives are always stupid (oh, yeah, dont forget Kerry in the mix). I find it funny that those who think they know it all know less than the rest of us. For we know we dont know it all, and that makes us a lot smarter than those clowns.
"You are not a "Burn a cross on the lawn" racist, but an institutional racist. You have to perpetuate racism to maintain your sense of purpose and power base. Whether you burn a cross on a lawn, or do it for other reasons, the end result is the same".
Err, you called me a IR.
You're completely misunderstanding this, nobody's is saying "he's our first black president" as a "pretty good for a black guy" qualifier and I challenge you to show me where anyone in the media has referred to his race as a qualifier. We're talking about two mutually exclusive issues here.
You've got the historically significant issue of a member of a race rising to be the leader of the country that once considered their race inferior and that has nothing to do with anything he did, he's just a man who became our president. It was what America did in electing him that makes this an historic event, because it says that most of America now sees him as just a man. That's something that wouldn't have happened just a few decades ago.
since you're claiming in the first two quoted statements above (i cooulda gone through all the comments and dragged em all up) the country is being deluged by media demands obama be given some sorta lifetime pass because he's black or that no comparison be made to any previous white president because they worry he'd not measure up--and since you've been blathering away about how widely and deeply this message is being spread--and, lastly, because in the third quoted statement you've condescended to recount my failings compared to your brilliant successes as a master debater and splain how its cuz, unlike you, i never present facts, please demonstrate your prowess in that regard and provide us all with evidence of the disturbing messages you condemn so vehemently here.
just so everyone's clear about this, i'm challenging you to provide factual evidence in the form of direct quotes uttered or verbatim statements authored by at least 10 prominent journalists or nationally broadcast/syndicated political analysts/commentators as well as the date and venue? can't do that? how bout from 5. or, hell, maybe just 3.
do i really gotta go back and dig up your sorry attempts to justify george allen as misunderstood or his disgusting racial remarks as a well-meaning attempt to demonstrate his respect for his fellow man? or your insistence that slavery benefited those africans fortunate enough to have become chattel because they were valuable property and therefore not subject to abuse?
at the time mlk made that statement, i doubt very much he intended it to mean "please don't think so highly of black people you fail to notice they're just as human as you". in fact i doubt it to the same extent i'm unconvinced he would have agreed with your attempt to diminish what has been a major milestone in america's journey and a quantum leap forward towards possibly becoming the america so many for such a long time wrongly claimed we were and he so correctly demanded we become.
dammit, i'm a post behind you again.
he can't and he won't even try.
i been watchin this happen for nearly 5 years and it's always the same ol shuck n jive.
Sorry, I mispoke.
Yes they are. You are the one misunderstanding as that is what this article is all about. ANd has been from the beginning. Go back and read my article and comments. Now we can disagree on whether they are saying it is a qualifier or not, but then I only have to google what I have already heard and read to prove you wrong. But like me, perhaps they misspoke? One misspeak, a chorus of misspeaks?
Well, you got part of it! Yes, the election was an historic event! And it validated King. The inauguration where we are told not to look at the president as one of 44, but as 1 of 1 was a repudiation of him. And again, that has nothing to do with all the celebrating crowds.
HOw about 2 or 1? How about I teach you google instead?
Yes, since it never happened. It was made into it by the racist in the media, and they had to stretch then to find some tangent to damn him on. But I dont guess you would see that. You are blinded by your hatred instead. That seems to be all that you have.
Only you would be so egotistical and shallow as to try to explain away racism and attach it to King. You are sorry. King said what he said. As he is gone, that is all we have to go on, except for omniscience people like you. WHo must condemn the dead with your own bias and stupidity because of an arrogance that defies conceit. You are a sorry fool. Who does not see anything but their own hatred and then extends it to places it does not exist. But as they say, misery do love company, and you are trying to get a lot of company.
What a sad and pathetic fool.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123249781178500439.html
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/news-articles/0901/09012101 (ok, that is UK - but then no one accused them of NOT being liberal and of course liberals want us to be like them)
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/inauguration/la-na-inaug-literati21-2009jan21,0,7682733.story
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/19/obama.speech/index.html
Just so you know, I will not have to prove you the fool any longer since you have done that yourself. ANd until you can actually admit you are wrong (as I have pointed out at least 3 times on this one article alone), you can do your own googling. But I doubt you will. As I said, you are not man enough to admit when you make mistakes (God forbid a LIberal is EVER wrong).
I do what I can when I can.
I think a lot of it comes down to so-called "white guilt". The notion that because some people in our nations history abused others based on their skin color is somehow a shame on all people in any way related to the abusers (ie sharing the same skin color) for all time. Thinking like this will continue to perpetuate some form of racism for some time to come unless people like you continue to educate people on what real racism is.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account
