There's a different "Hey, you, out of the gene pool" story in the Wash Post today--even gives an opportunity to whine about video games being 'dangerous' for little kids.

A 6-year-old missed the schoolbus and decided to take his sleeping mom's car instead--managed to drive over 10 miles and no one died!

Edit: the kid might be an example of how two 'wrongs' might make a right--he really wanted not to be late for school, and he was 'smart' enough to figure out the basics of driving from playing Grand Theft Auto and Monster Truck Jam.

Indeed I did speak.  I'm suprised your keen intellect noticed it was an insult.  Did it take you a full 17 days to form that fiery retort Dr. Quickwit?  Be careful, if you make it much hotter, your wifebeater shirt might catch on fire!

Quote from Adolfs dad:

"There's a new president and he says it's time for a change; well, then it's time for a change"

I'd say that comment is a wee bit scarier than naming your kid Adolf. Still, if we all keep thwumping out our little miracles, I'm sure we'll get that shakespeare manuscript eventually. Oh no wait...wrong metaphor...

First, sainthood.  The insulting post with no swear words in it.  That was one of your miracles, a requirement for obtaining sainthood under catholicism.  It's called a joke.  As to specifically being one of the anointed, slightly less a joke, but still a joke.  The anointed refers to pushy liberals that want to subject the rest of the population to their help, whether they want it or not.  I have also already told you that I myself am included in my list of idiots.

I call everyone a moron, posting in these threads isn't any active seeking on my part.  It's a weakness, a pull I lack the discipline to make myself avoid most of the time.  I see the offending title, read the offending thread, and comment on the offending posts.  It's fun to argue, particularly when it's pointless.  It's always pointless on the internet, although I've heard claims and rumors of people convinced by arguments on the internet.

The gun control bit.  It's called a hypothetical.  Being one of the anointed, I ventured a guess that you'd be pro gun control.  Generally, people that are for state run health care, think we're going to destroy the world by returning a piddling amount of CO2 back to where it came from, and generally go stark raving mad when a right winger calls them names on the internet, are also anti gun because "guns" kill people.  It's clearly a hypothetical regardless of your stance as I used if in a liberal manner.

Subject free, my question is, would you refute misinformation provided by a supporter of your side, or let it slide.  If so, is that not equally dishonest as the spreader?

GW, bite me.  If you're going to label me as food, you have to pick our own stuff.  Right wingers don't eat foreign food after all.  Also, it's been -25 here in Anchorage, I've been wearing shorts and an unlined leather jacket while walking to stores, and sweating while I do it.  Pansy.

So theres now more to the story. I think DYFS is just a pit too quick on the trigger for taking kids from their families.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,479904,00.html 

Well the toilet was invented by Francis Crapper... I wonder if his family changed their name.