Some time ago I decided I'd had enough of Vista and would go back to XP. After 2 BSODS and explorer crashing when I tried to rename a file, I decided now was the time.
Sounds easy... I disconected 3 of my four drives, partitioned and formatted my O/S drive, and started the XP install procedure. Hmmm, evertime I got to the part where I expected it to say 'Press any key to boot from disk...' it just went straight into setup again. Nothing I did to the drive with either formatting or partitioning would get past this. Clearly, Vista still had it's grubby little paws on this disk.
So, back to basics. Thankfully when I built this pc I kept a floppy drive... Out came my Windows98 boot disk and straight into DOS. From there I used my equally ancient Killdisk. It took an hour and a half for Killdisk to finish, but it took Vista and erased its ass. Vista is no more, it has ceased to be - it is an ex O/S.
XP installed as smooth as ever. So here I am, in an O/S which so far has no drivers or programs installed. I'll get to that later. Meanwhile I can stick two fingers up (in the form of a 'V') to Vista. Hasta la Vista Vista, as they say
Why would I when XP provides better performance and a less intrusive UI? There's a huge number of configurations that could run Vista, but get nothing but reduced performance out of it.
well i keep my fingers crossed for windows 7 looks good of what ive read!
It's amazing how many people don't know how to properly organize a start menu in XP and end up with a screen full of menu. Mine is very compact and easy to use. Moreover, if you don't know what you are looking for it's all there in front of you.
With Vista, you click down into folders, realize what you want is not there, and have to click back again - very annoying.
I put together a custom this past summer and had the missfortune to put Vista on it... Sadly I don't feel like forking over the cash or effort to put XP back on here... Oh well it isn't that bad... Only two BOD's... And other stuff...
*Sigh
fuzzy, i completely agree with your statement concerning people not knowing how to organize a start menu. actually, i couldn't agree more. however, i dont agree with your opinion of the vista start menu be annoying. to each his own, though. i LOVE raisin pie. chances are, you do not.
as for daton's comment about reduced performance, i can not agree with that at all. i keep a spare hdd sitting in my rig just for xp. i very seldom boot into xp....maybe twice a month. i think vista outperforms xp a great deal.
i repair only rigs i built for clients. i build 3 to 5 each week. that isn't much, i know, but for no advertising other than word-of-mouth, it isn't bad. i'd bet i build more than the 3 computer shops in town, though. anyway, it's a few extra dollars a month for me back to my point: when repairing rigs that have a 'windows problem', i'd say a vast majority of them are xp based rigs. it's not often i get called for a vista related problem. most of the vista related issues are due to the new vista users not knowing where the items they want are now located in vista. usually, it's a control panel item. since vista was released, i've had but one client ask to have vista removed and xp installed. that was due to him not wanting to purchase more than 1 gig of ram. i admit vista needs ram! (the parts for a new i7 based rig should be here tomorrow. i'm looking forward to building that one! phil may not see it until wednesday evening or thursday morning LOL))
Whoa.
Raisin pie?
Never had that.
I like lemon. And key lime. And chocolate. IN THAT ORDER!!!!!
Samurye.
Key lime > all.
For the record when I switched to Vista I actually got better performance except when running DX10 (duh). I waited until last spring and upgraded to 64bit and everything's been smooth going except for some audio driver issues (due to 64bit) and getting use to the gui layouts.
Do you need to switch? Nope. But I've had no serious issues in the past nine months and rarely do I have any crashes and lockups. To be honest, I'm not sure I've even had a bsod, but I certainly haven't been plagued by em.
Did you miss the memo?
This thread is about pie now.
I has my first BSOD in Vista x64 last night. I tried to install a free ZIP proggie (7Z, I think it was called) to see if it was any good or not... as soon as I clicked the install button after setup, Vista spat the dummy and went to a BSOD. It was no biggie, though, I just did a restart and ran ccleaner to remove any entries, etc... all has been fine since.
The only other time I had a BSOD in Vista was in Vista Ultimate 32 bit when I had a faulty graphics card. However, that was a hardware issue and resolved with a replacement card.
The performance in vista for games and software are proven less than in XP.... alot of benchmarks on this and i confirm this doing benchmarks myself. BUT one thing i like about vista is how it handles memory compared to vista i had alot of RAM errors in XP that does not happen in vista...(i get these errors because of high volt when OC burned some sticks hehe).. Ive tried the ultimate 64bit and dont see any advantage for the average user just more problems less drivers so if anyone thinking of switching to vista pick 32bit atleast for some year/years mabye the world will be 64bit enough when win7 comes somewhere around 2010... And more problems with xp machines is probably because its a more open OS than Vista... me being a advanced user, hate this about vista the UAC makes me go YUK! Vista feels like its for people who dont want to know computers.. alot of crap happens in the background without your knowledge... in XP this is more transparent that also is its problem for a beginner or dontcare type of user its just to much options in senetive areas that u can mess up hence MS came up with UAC... anyway i think ill quit my ramblings here heh
Vista 64 ftw and never looking back. Atleast it's awesome on my computer
Regarding Vista and performance, i came across this yesterday: http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2304031,00.asp
These test show that after Vista SP1 the performance is equal or even better than XP. I wouldn't be surprised if there are test showing the opposite, though.
I've had Vista since day 1, and i've never had any problems with it.
I'll be the first to admit driver support used to be shaky, and the was an initial performace drop on XP, but now, its stable, I have far less crashes than I did on XP, and the new memory learning features of Vista actually make programs load faster.
I do believe you have to have a system for it. I run, AMD Phenom 9850, 8Gb Ram, GTX 260, so i get fantastic speed on everything. But as an OS I love Vista, and i'll move on to 7 when it's out too.
I see an argument on similar scale to this in the flight sim community, between FS2004 and FSX, but even though the newer program has less support, and more bugs, its the future, and will be improved, whereas the older one will eventually be dropped.
Yes with XP sp3 and Vista sp1 there is a close call with xp edgeing out vista.. but vista is much slower on filetransfers except single file filetransfer.. where it is much faster.. unpacking/extracting much slower... but vista will improve while xp probably wont... yet im hoping that win7 will be what vista should have been and what xp was for its predecessors... only time will tell
That is not exactly your regular joe's computer and asking such a system upgrade is alot of cash just to have a OS run great.. well computer hardware will get alot better and soon well in (3-4years anyway) it will spit at vista as a fart in space....
voidcore, i don't consider myself to be an ordinary computer user, either. on my rig, vista outperforms xp hands down. about upgrading rigs to run an os, people had to do it when xp was released, too. it happens every single time a new os is released. the argument of having to upgrade is mute. you always have to do it. if i still had my athlon 3200 with 2 gig of ram, i'd be running xp. actually, that rig is running xp but it's at my daughter's house .
regarding your statement to stay away from vista64.....well, you're wrong. i respect your opinion but i completely disagree with it. 64 bit is the way to go these days. unless you have an ancient piece of hardware like the canon scanner sitting on a shelf in my garage, you'll not have any problems finding drivers. with the price of memory these days, it's fairly cheap to upgrade to 4 and even 8 gigs of ram. heck, the reaper ram i use is on sale for 65 bucks on newegg today. i'm buying 4 sets of it for future use in client rigs.
anyway, some people who have tried vista just weren't happy wioth it and reverted to xp. fuzzy is one of those people. each person has his/her opinion and i respect that. i switched to vista ultimate 64 the day it was released and have not had a single unhappy moment with the os.
64 bit will eventualy replace 32 bit, but 64 bit and vista are 2 different things, 64 bit works fine, only to bad old stuff cant be run on it
it's vista thats causing trouble, not 64 bit and after only a week i got fed up with it and returned to XP, heard microsoft is working on something called windows 7, sure hope it's a complete makeover, and actually works smoothly unlike vista :/
64bit have been the way to go for quite a while.. but it have not been mainstream enough and badly supported.. im glad you dont have any problems as it is as you say the future but it will not be a every household thing until some year(s), when we can throw away 32bit completely.. and yes ddr2 is very cheap much cheaper than it have been for ram ever... ddr3 that is the future is not cheap... if you are going the ddr2 way for client rigs today when all new mobos only run ddr3 soon... you are going the wrong way in my opinion ddr2 good for today obsolete tomorrow... i Also switched to vista 64bit when it came and formatted my drive a month later, it may be so that it works alot better now then when it came as it should be... now im on 32bit Vista Ultimate have been for some months and i do feel it is more sluggish and moving large files and unpacking there is a notable differnce, need a RAM uppgrade from my 2GB DDR2 but.. why waste money on DDR2 when im planning on getting a new system with nehalem and ddr3
Of course it does. You've got more than 2 gigs of RAM. You literally need 64 bit Vista to even use your hardware. But more than 2 gigs is not the standard (nor useful except for non-gaming high intensity tasks) - and with 2 gigs, XP outperforms Vista.
actually, i have 8.
on a side note, you should see this i7 rig i finished an hour ago. the client may have a difficult time getting me to deliver it tomorrow and i LOVE this Silverstone case!
Silverstone make great cases a little overprice imo, thats why i have this inexpensive Lian li case (PC-A71B)
beside me
yeah, i know what ya mean. i have a lian-li v1200b myself. it's a great case. the silverstone ft01-b/w is really a nicely crafted case, too. i've built 2 rigs using that case in the last few days and the more i see it, the more i like it. i like the interior being powder-coated. i can do without the window, tho.
100th post.
Samurye..
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account