Gateway Pundit has revealed all the details. The name of the Sarah Palin E-mail hacker/lamer is David Kernell, and he is (not surprisingly), the son of a Tennessee Dem State Rep.
Agreed. I assume that that is Bush's fault as well? I am not as willing to assume that 50% of the country are just morons who all got fooled by Bush into acting as you describe. If that is the case that he has got to be incredibly brilliant and powerful. The radical overhaul needs to be with each of us individually and stop blaming BUsh for everything in the world that went astray as we watched.
Still can't edit, sorry.
4 years with McCain after 8 years with bush. We wood be Doomed for sure.
Life is so much better right now with Bush.
You just need to ask yourself. Are you living a good life with no worries? Are thing really as good as They say?
I know that we are in one of the worst times. If you don't believe me just watch the news. Or better yet fill up your gas tank.
Based on that last part, I take it you're saying that only a person with a top-level university degree is allowed to be president? Based on that criteria, it should be easy to setup a database of every living american, filter out everyone except those with outstanding university educations and then present your list of possible candidates for president based on those results?
How about military service for your country? Wouldn't that credential apply? McCain served and almost died for his country and he knew that when he entered the service. How many candidates have willingly entered military service and served their country knowing that they could possibly die during that term of service? That seems like a pretty decent consideration to take into account.
I'm not bashing education or even outstanding educational credentials as those that were listed, let's just make it clear that isn't the only criteria or probably not the most important set of criteria to consider when electing someone as the president.
- maybe you should reconsider your statement, look at those that are unfortunate to have been born in countries without access to food, water, health care, etc.
Things can always be much worse than they are, be thankful for the things you have and focus on those things first before lamenting on the negative.
http://finance.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX:.DJI%20INDEXNASDAQ:.IXIC%20INDEXSP:.INX
But I am talking about those who have been around for at least the last 8 years in the states.
Other countries will alays have there problems too.
More important, the question that should be asked is...
- Is he a PC or a MAC?
Inquiring minds want to know!
(anyone else love these new emoticons? - man, they're awesome!)
Your statement & reply back are fair enough to be sure, what I was trying to say is that when you compare north american life to those human beings living in countries where access to food, water, access to medical assistance is very limited, etc. Life on this side of the pond is that bad comparatively speaking.
Just thought I would say that (and yes I'm probably being a smarta$$ in the process, sorry about that)
meant to say ISN'T that bad, not IS that bad
- I suddenly can't edit posts in the forum, another wc site issue?
Having said all. and whatever Happens with the election.
I Am Proud to Be American!
Where did I say they should be? They have the responsibility to regulate interstate trade and that's just the way the division of powers says it. If you don't like the idea of the Feds regulating trade, amend the Constitution, Zu.
We're gonna end up on welfare because our jobs will disappear thanks to the current administration's lack of doing the oversight it should have been doing. Allowing the market to be "free" (Bushese for not doing your job and letting your cronies profit from it) invited the current collapse. That's just fact. I don't like it, but it's the truth.
Would the Dems be better? I don't know. The Republicans did screw the pooch royally, though, and if you can't see that what's the point of arguing it farther?
Your last sentence is a non sequiter, but I certainly agree with the sentiment.
Having said that though . . the commerce clause puts the power in not the exuctive branch but in the legistlative one. So where does that put us? Still the president's fault? Still his responsability?
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3:
"The Congress shall have power . . . .to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;"
Island Dog, nowhere have I said Obama will "wave his wand". Our standing in the world matters a great deal and you know it! All I'm saying is this country can not afford another 4 years of the current policies. Tell me something McCain will change. If he states he'll change anything, that would go against his actions the last 5 yearsI was a McCain supporter for years. Like I said, until 5 years ago, I agreed with most of his beliefs. Not now. He's aligned himself with the religious right and I totally disagree with that.
i won't be replying anymore in the thread. i have my strong beliefs, you have yours. the thing is i'm right and you're wrong
well that cleared it up for me....
OUCH!
Hope that was a friendly winky!
(mine is)
Indeed.
The same way Bush has anything to do with this election, but since the Democrats are stuck in "run against Bush" mode, they havan't noticed he's not on the ballot in any state.
The Congress is responsible through the SEC, DOJ, FTC etc. The guys who run the agencies are appointed by the Executive Branch...ie the Attorney General (appointed by Executive and confirmed and voted on by the Senate...ie Gonzalez!) Gonna blame that on Bush? YUP!
The only person that I can think of that would be crazy enough to vote mccain/palin is someone who has their pockets lined by the oil industry. This country's economy is crumbling all around us under the bush presidency and you expect us to want more of that. We might as well just crawl into a hole and die if that is the case. If there is 4 more years of bush, this country is so screwed!
You said it!
Amen
I've been reading this post and I've seen alot of commenting about how the president is responsible for all our troubles.....ONE MAN does not run this country! ONE MAN cannot be responsibe for every problem we face. ONE MAN cannot be the solution to all our problems.
Sure, whoever does become president will have an impact, but it's CONGRESS we need to clean!
I find it hard to believe how many/ most americans buy into the propaganda spewed out by both parties trying do get the "power".
It's a giant puppetshow and has been for years or even decades. I believe that the government has been a unified effort to do whatever they want , while in the meantime as the people are left arguing politics and pushing blame around. All the while, mesmerised by the shining lights and mood music of the show.
Now of course, what you have just read MAY not bee 100% accurate. Even though,I am sure there is much slight of hand being played on the masses.
Xiandi for Prez '08. You seem to know what most (even the pathetic excuse for "the media") fail to undrstand. Thanks for being one of the most realistic posts on the subject.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account
