With palms together,
There is an interesting article in the N Y Times today about a stone tablet found amid the Dead Sea Scrolls. Apparently it suggests that the notion of a suffering messiah who would rise in three days was a common belief in the century prior to the Christian Jesus.
The article suggests:
If such a messianic description really is there, it will contribute to a developing re-evaluation of both popular and scholarly views of Jesus, since it suggests that the story of his death and resurrection was not unique but part of a recognized Jewish tradition at the time.
Hmmm. The death and resurrection myth prior to Jesus' birth? It would seem this adds to the notion advance some decades ago by a Jewish scholar suggesting this whole Jesus script was a scheme to get Jesus recognized as the Messiah, that Jesus was aware of the things that needd to happen before they happened in order to meet the criteria.
And later:
Mr. Knohl said that it was less important whether Simon was the messiah of the stone than the fact that it strongly suggested that a savior who died and rose after three days was an established concept at the time of Jesus. He notes that in the Gospels, Jesus makes numerous predictions of his suffering and New Testament scholars say such predictions must have been written in by later followers because there was no such idea present in his day.
But there was, he said, and “Gabriel’s Revelation” shows it.
“His mission is that he has to be put to death by the Romans to suffer so his blood will be the sign for redemption to come,” Mr. Knohl said. “This is the sign of the son of Joseph. This is the conscious view of Jesus himself. This gives the Last Supper an absolutely different meaning. To shed blood is not for the sins of people but to bring redemption to Israel.”
Strange.
Link
Be well
I have no idea. Neither does anyone else. We have no independent witnesses of the events in this time, only the words contained in the gospels which were written by people who had a vested interest in making the case Jesus was divine.
Be well.
Lula, Nice recap. You seem stuck on these talmudic comments. You seem to make light of context. Please understand your church systematically hunted down, tortured and killed Jews during the centuries prior to and contemporaneous with the comments you are alluding to. ..or have you forgotten the inquisition and other terrors surrounding it? It forced conversions. Christian nations systematically deprived Jews of land ownership, citizenship, and education, expelled them en masse. And what did the historical Jews you refer to do? Amuse themselves with stories about their torturers. I'd call it gallows humor myself.
I thought the Times article was interesting and I have had an interest in early Christian beginnings. We must be careful speculating about what happened 2000 years ago. There is very little contemporaneous evidence and a ton of material written about what there is.
For my money, I think Jesus really thought he was the Man. I think he orchestrated the whole thing. But that's just my guess. I don't think he faked anything. I just think he really was convinced he was the Messiah. Now, the problem is that all along we thought contemporaneous Jews did not think the promised messiah was divine. Its the tablet this article talks about that sort of pops that one out. All along we thought it was Paul spinning the story. Who knows. It is an interesting story though.
Nightshades,
You raise an interesting point regarding will. From a Zen POV, we are all perfect as we are in the sense that we are one with the universe. In mystical Judaism, God permeates everything. There is no place where God is not. In a sense, in both cases, we are partners with the Infinite as life unfolds. So, from a Big Mind context, all of the universe in every manifestation is a manifestation of God. Its the Small Mind, the relative point of view, the view from the ego or the self, that adds intent to the picture, adds valuation to the picture. We assign meaning, we assign this as "good", that as "evil". And so on. Yet in the Big Picture, all is God. Good and evil are human attributes and completely within our own control.
For some reason, we humans require drama in our lives. Hence "The Passover Plot" or "The War Against Christianity" or Jewish stories about Christians, and then there is the drama queen of the airways, Fox News.
My sense is that we can talk to understand ourselves better, both as human beings and as God's partners, or we can talk to infuriate one another, adding that dramatic element to our lives. I'm surethere are many things in between.
KFC, You make an excellent case. Christians in other countries are being targeted. And Christian investment in making everything Christian is also being defended against by non-Christians. The problem as I see it is in the need Christians seem to have in bringing Christ to everyone regardless of their faith. When you mess with a person's family or his deeply held religious convictions you invite attack. Now, you can call that counter attack a "war" if you want to, but I guarentee in the main it will stop as soon as Christians learn to respect the boundaries of others.
I might add, that Islam needs to learn this same lesson.
For Lula: In truth, My belief has always been there are many paths to G-ds door, no religion has exclusive rights to his heart or to his house, My remark about only Jews can get to heaven and everyone else is doomed to hell was a jab at people that take themselves to darn serious. Especially the ones that condemn everyone else to hell...... if they don't somehow believe as THEY DO!.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account