With palms together,
There is an interesting article in the N Y Times today about a stone tablet found amid the Dead Sea Scrolls. Apparently it suggests that the notion of a suffering messiah who would rise in three days was a common belief in the century prior to the Christian Jesus.
The article suggests:
If such a messianic description really is there, it will contribute to a developing re-evaluation of both popular and scholarly views of Jesus, since it suggests that the story of his death and resurrection was not unique but part of a recognized Jewish tradition at the time.
Hmmm. The death and resurrection myth prior to Jesus' birth? It would seem this adds to the notion advance some decades ago by a Jewish scholar suggesting this whole Jesus script was a scheme to get Jesus recognized as the Messiah, that Jesus was aware of the things that needd to happen before they happened in order to meet the criteria.
And later:
Mr. Knohl said that it was less important whether Simon was the messiah of the stone than the fact that it strongly suggested that a savior who died and rose after three days was an established concept at the time of Jesus. He notes that in the Gospels, Jesus makes numerous predictions of his suffering and New Testament scholars say such predictions must have been written in by later followers because there was no such idea present in his day.
But there was, he said, and “Gabriel’s Revelation” shows it.
“His mission is that he has to be put to death by the Romans to suffer so his blood will be the sign for redemption to come,” Mr. Knohl said. “This is the sign of the son of Joseph. This is the conscious view of Jesus himself. This gives the Last Supper an absolutely different meaning. To shed blood is not for the sins of people but to bring redemption to Israel.”
Strange.
Link
Be well
Agreed. Yet roles are not individual, they are social constructs. Religion has had a historic role in creating or certainly influencing (and perhaps legislating) these constructs. Its like women were free to decide who they would become, but only amongst a set of prescribed roles based on what the Church said was appropriate. I see this as sexist, pure and simple.
But see, I don't see Christ as the head of anything, nor do I see the husband as the head. I see marriage as a partnership where roles are decided internally, not externally.
Be well.
Nightshades, it has nothing to do with whether or not your copy of the bible says what you say it says. It has to do with what the original Hebrew says. The original Hebrew text from which all bibles are translated, uses the Hebrew word for "murder" not "kill".
See ya.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account
