LOL! Great article and some interesting points! A white person don't have to lobby to be black or Hispanic, they are already many in the equation, it just depends on what they identify themselve as. But there we go again, what do you identify with? And the conversation goes on and on and on....etc., etc...
sorry i haven't responded - for some reason, i couldn't access joeuser yesterday.
the conversation goes on - but it seems to gain energy and intensity. reverend wright - he doesn't speak for all black people. but now everybody is suggesting he speaks for A LOT of black people. maybe.
patriotism . . . in the united states, there's a mob mentality that screams, "supporting your country is priority number one! and we're going to ask everybody to go ahead and support your country in a carefully prescribed, particular manner." identity politics.
taboo
Ame-Rican . . . never heard that before, charles. i wonder whether you ever feel a conflict, on the level of day-to-day living, when you're explaining things to teachers, students, your kids, your friends . . . .
cacto:
granted, i don't know anything about aust. economics or politics; however, it sounds like your "self" identifies closely with your economic class . . .
so i have to ask: do other cynical Australian tertiary-educated public servants identify very differently than you do - either at the voting booth or on the street or at the australian-rules football match (sorry)?
i agree - or nearly. i question whether we really "choose" which identity is most relevant at a given time. my belief is that we identify automatically based on need, or or identity is chosen for us by the system that's been imprinted on our neurons from day one. given a social situation, we appear to have several alignment choices. like a multiple choice test. maybe we have the option to choose other, maybe not. but even when we have the choice to choose other, we rarely are allowed to simply sign our name - we are never aligning with our OWN unique identity, are we? not socially, at least.
charles,
interesting - may i ask a political question? i seem to remember hearing that political alignment in puerto rico fell into four basic parties - and at least one of the major issues was that of defining the relationship with the united states. that seems like a crucial part of this identification process. do you have a take on that? maybe you don't feel like your identity is determined by that debate, but a lot of people seem to take it seriously, don't they?
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account